Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
this will be the r520, which will probably be the x900, or maybe a whole new name, 24 pipe monster card, this is the card i'm going to get when i get a G5 next summer.
 
Good thing I passed on the GEforce 6800. It already looks old, since it can't do H.264 decodes. Whichever card does support it, I'll be whipping out the wallet. Let's hope it doesn't initially retail for $600.
 
Hardware Acceleration...

They said is for playback....how about encoding video?
Could someone please explain how enconding video works on Tiger with H264.
What do iNeed to have a nice enconding H264 video.
:cool:
 
i'm sorry nagromme how is it bad that a company is going to try to improve performance? no one said you have to use ATI to play H.246
 
Lacero said:
Agreed. What an idiot.

Ummm. . . We all know that nagromme is sarcastic, so the only idiot is the guy who called him one.

In addition, it won't be long before nVidia AND ATi have a software solution that will enable current cards to accelerate H.264.
 
The rumour doesn't specify whether it will be on ATI cards built for PC or Mac, or for both? However, it sounds great and is another bound for Hi-Def. The Year of Hi-Def is shapeing up very nicely.
 
gangst said:
The rumour doesn't specify whether it will be on ATI cards built for PC or Mac, or for both? However, it sounds great and is another bound for Hi-Def. The Year of Hi-Def is shapeing up very nicely.

Well, since H.264 only plays on macs we can assume macs.
 
SPUY767 said:
Well, since H.264 only plays on macs we can assume macs.


Quicktime 7 will be available on PC shortly, and soon H.264 will be built into Windows Media Player, so it doesn't fully proove these new ATI cards will be for Mac. You can also encode H.264 on the PC using some apps too. Plus the Mac video market is very small.
 
This is good news to hear,

As for the encoding since Apple seem to be moving calculations over to the GPU anyway with Core Image/Video you can bet that once this thing is out they will speed up the encoding time, after all it still takes a fair while on a G5 so they will want to give this performance to their pro systems
 
Once this technology makes its way into all the Macs, multi-way iChats will be far less processor-intensive. This will also open the door for more than 4-way video chat in iChat, as well as new H.264-related video effects that simply weren't possible before. Great news, I'd say...
 
SPUY767 said:
Ummm. . . We all know that nagromme is sarcastic, so the only idiot is the guy who called him one.
Are you saying Jimsowden is an idiot? Be very careful. Only mods can call other people idiots.
 
SPUY767 said:
Ummm. . . We all know that nagromme is sarcastic, so the only idiot is the guy who called him one.

In addition, it won't be long before nVidia AND ATi have a software solution that will enable current cards to accelerate H.264.
I didn't call anyone an idiot. I was being sarcastic, saying I hate people that are negative, in an extreamly negative sentence. I guess that's irony.
 
SPUY767 said:
Well, since H.264 only plays on macs we can assume macs.
Untrue, H.264 was available on the PC before Tiger and QuickTime 7. Third-party PC applications like Nero support both H.264 and HE-AAC (audio) and several downloadable utilities work with H.264 (on both PCs and Macs).

In any case, just because an ATI card supports (or will support) H.264 in hardware does not automatically mean that it will be supported on Macs. You can bet that it will appear on PCs first, then __maybe__ it will get support on the Mac. Look, even today Macs have very little support for hardware (video card or GPU) accelerated MPEG2, on the Mac its done mostly in software. Macs have seldom taken advantage of the hardware MPEG2 or DVD support that exists in many GPUs, so why does anyone think it will be different with H.264?
 
wrldwzrd89 said:
Both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray can use a WMV-based codec, H.264, or even a mixture of the two!

Okay, I understand the concept that HD-DVD and Blu-Ray are physical specs, and WMV or H.264 is the software/encoding specs.. but isn't a standard codec MORE important than a standard hardware format? I mean, standard codec means the "delivery platform" shouldn't matter... download, streaming, or read off an optical drive...
 
Will these cards likely go back to 8x AGP?

It seems all of the mid-level PCs (over $1000 Dells and the like) now use PCI-16x graphics cards. Does it seem likely that new cards are going to be made also on the AGP 8x standard?

I've seen the technology move leave me behind - AGP 4x in my dulie 1.42, so I can get a 128 MB ATI 9800, but not the edition with 256 MB (8x only).

I suppose the possible architecture (still wondering if the RAM-type will change, too) changes are just around the corner, week after next.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.