Wow you have me convinced. I'm going out to buy 200 feet of Ethernet 10/100 cable. Get a Ethernet HUB. Go up my attic. Drill some holes and hope to fish it through the walls to the first floor. Figure out how to get past the beam supports between the frames. Then I can run the cable across the floor or up against the baseboard to the entertainment system. Spend hours and hours to get this done and when finished have the 10/100 cable to ATV4. Hmmmmm maybe I can just pop the ATV4 anywhere in the house and just turn on WiFi ac and enjoy 600MB/s within minutes. I think I'll just stick to my WiFi ac for now. LOL
Yea, obviously if ethernet is not practical then wifi is great because it's the
only option. For those that have an house wired for ethernet and a wifi network, ethernet is the clear preferred choice.
I was mostly responding to your assertion that Mbps speed is soooo important and that 100Mbps is somehow inadequate. Both those points are wrong. In terms of speed, 100Mbps, 600Mbps, 1000Mbps, 6000Mbps are all more than adequate. When streaming, as long as you can maintain a reliable speed over what is needed, higher speed than that doesn't mean better (unless you watch movies in faster than real-time, which would be strange). Having 600Mbps doesn't make the streams any better than 100Mbps. Like I said earlier, even 1080p blu-rays don't use more than 48Mbps natively. 100Mbps will be more than enough for the entire lifetime of the ATV4, unless you have access to source material of higher quality than uncompressed blu-ray.
Also to nitpick your units, you keep saying 600MB/s. I kind of doubt you're getting 600 Mega
Bytes per second (M
B/s), which would mean you have a solid 4800Mbps connection far in excess of what 802.11ac can do. I'm sure you measured 600 Mega
bits per second (M
b/s) though, which sounds about right for a mid-range AC router and client. I know it's a minor point, but I'm an engineer by training and units matter
