mmm donutThey should add a negative reinforcement electrical shock anytime someone opens the fridge, walks into a fast food joint, picks up a donut, sits on the couch too long, etc.
Yeah, you bring up a good point about the chosen adjectives they’re using to describe one’s body type. That seems totally sophomoric to be using high school language, when they probably could’ve given some more analytical descriptions what somebody is specifically where they’re at physically without having to call somebody ‘Twiggy’. I’m not sure what the thought process was there. Maybe try to make this seem kind of quip or clever-ish.Looks like the app was written by frat bros. "Twiggy" vs "Jacked" as data metrics? Seriously?
And is this the kind of measurement you need to have updated constantly daily? That's a lot of uncomfortable hardware on your wrist for something you'd only want to measure periodically. Unless you are trying to reinforce negative body image obsessions throughout the day to insure maximum psychological damage to yourself.
Hard pass.
Probably not. It's a lot more profitable to cram all the sensors into a new and expensive watch upgrade than it would be to allow people to keep using the same smart band for years and years. Unless, of course, hardware or software upgrades break compatibility. A deprecated SDK here, an incompatible pin there...Sounds very cool. There really is a lot of untapped potential in the Apple Watch. I wonder if Apple will explore adding "smart" bands to the Watch in the future?
My first reaction was "Since when is 'Jacked' a scientifically accepted term to describe someone's physical condition."Looks like the app was written by frat bros. "Twiggy" vs "Jacked" as data metrics? Seriously?
And is this the kind of measurement you need to have updated constantly daily? That's a lot of uncomfortable hardware on your wrist for something you'd only want to measure periodically. Unless you are trying to reinforce negative body image obsessions throughout the day to insure maximum psychological damage to yourself.
Hard pass.
These types of body fat monitoring rely on algorithms more than anything. Ive never found them to accurate especially if you are an athlete. I've had various scales that were not really accurate. I'd take measurements pre and post running and would find that my body fat would drop anywhere from 3-7% LOL. Not really possible unless I was running a marathon, which I wasn't.I was looking into the accuracy of this thing. Their website says 95% measurement accuracy, and there's an asterisk that says "according to internal research". Anyone can say that.
Anyway, a little pricey.
I've had DEXA-scans. They can tell me the muscle to fat to bone ratio in any of my limbs, complete with density, like say my left calf. Are they saying this watch band can tell the bone density in my left leg accurate to 95%? No way.
I agree. That would be overpromising. I ASSUME they’re talking whole-body measurement only. But companies will say lots of things if they think it will get you to spend your money on their stuff.
It's the same way scales do it. They send an electrical signal through your body, and they measure how long it takes to come back. Electricity travels at different speeds between water, muscle and fat. This is like the handgrips on early body analysis scales.I agree, I'm definitely interested but also curious how a sensor on my watch band can detect fat/muscle composition. Not only that, but are those metrics changing enough that I need to constantly monitor it?
I have a scale that does this and basically you should try to use around the same time everyday, like after you wake up. And it’s not really about the absolute value, which can change based on how much you sweat, etc it’s more about tracking trends, the changes over time, like if your muscle mass is increasing, for that it’s pretty accurate/useful.These types of body fat monitoring rely on algorithms more than anything. Ive never found them to accurate especially if you are an athlete. I've had various scales that were not really accurate. I'd take measurements pre and post running and would find that my body fat would drop anywhere from 3-7% LOL. Not really possible unless I was running a marathon, which I wasn't.
I always do the same check with app-related products. If you can't provide an adequate app, your product and your subscription aren't worth it.2.2 star rating on the App Store.
I’ll pass.
I get your point but Id rather it be accurate. If its about tracking trends then I find looking in the mirror is just as helpful.I have a scale that does this and basically you should try to use around the same time everyday, like after you wake up. And it’s not really about the absolute value, which can change based on how much you sweat, etc it’s more about tracking trends, the changes over time, like if your muscle mass is increasing, for that it’s pretty accurate/useful.
It's the same way scales do it. They send an electrical signal through your body, and they measure how long it takes to come back. Electricity travels at different speeds between water, muscle and fat. This is like the handgrips on early body analysis scales.
The downside is that they can be wildly inaccurate, and for people who are fit, or very fit, even more inaccurate. That's because these usually are skewed to people with low body muscle. If you're someone that works out a lot, the standard scales that do body analysis won't do it correctly. Tanita has a scale, for example, specifically for people working out a few days a week or more.
I'm not a thin dude but when I weightlifter and cycled all the time, the standard scales would say that I was like 30% body fat, while the athlete-calibrated ones would say like 18%.
Maybe this thing uses your workout stats to determine if you're athletic or not and modifies the analysis data that way, but I doubt it.
This has to be 100% a scam. There is no way a scan of your wrist can provide any accurate body fat percentage of bone density
I really wish Apple would shift its health focus from workouts to patients with cognitive decline. There's so much opportunity to do real good for real people, rather than just improve split times for the already-motivated.Definitely some good direction showing Apple the untapped usefulness of the Apple Watch.