Automater can convert to .m4v so how come it's never mentioned here?

[hankkosovo]

I've never seen it mentioned, is there a reason for that, mostly people seem to talk about subler, handbrake, iflicks etc.

 

[CocoaPuffs]

Is it better than Handbrake? Does it profit any additional benefit beyond Handbrake besides that it is an option?

 

[rjphoto]

Interesting.

Haven't done that before.

Can you point us to some instructions?

 

[BuddyRich]

I think it is because it wont convert from an MKV container, which is the most likely source for these conversions.

 

[lunaoso]

The UI an features of Handbrake are also a big feature.

 

[hankkosovo]

Interesting.

Haven't done that before.

Can you point us to some instructions?

I found a walk through of how to automate the process of taking a download, converting it and sticking it in itunes. And the conversion process was the simplest bit of the tutorial, the link is here http://www.mactalk.com.au/content/organising-media-hazel-part-1-1017/

----------

I think it is because it wont convert from an MKV container, which is the most likely source for these conversions.

Awww if thats true, makes it a bit useless then.