In my last post i said i would use a Polar heart monitor and AW to compare the two.
I updated AW to latest OS and fitted watch firmly, and set up Polar on other wrist with strap.
That got some comment at gym.
I use heartwatch app. I cannot see how to use that actvity thing or work out the data feedback.
Findings....
At steady heart rate both read the same.
If bpm is accelerared as on doing situps with weight, Polar gets it immediately. aW delays up to ten seconds.
At times it is erratic...wild swing to 70 bpm, then 130, before settling down to match Polar.
I doubt if aw gets average bpm over the workout correct.
Polar gives me avearge and peak bpm and duration of workout.
I use heartwatch app. So far i cannot see how to get peak bpm
Anyway, if you want just heart rate monitoring get Polar ( mine cost $49 here)
If you want completeness and complexity and cost get AW
I updated AW to latest OS and fitted watch firmly, and set up Polar on other wrist with strap.
That got some comment at gym.
I use heartwatch app. I cannot see how to use that actvity thing or work out the data feedback.
Findings....
At steady heart rate both read the same.
If bpm is accelerared as on doing situps with weight, Polar gets it immediately. aW delays up to ten seconds.
At times it is erratic...wild swing to 70 bpm, then 130, before settling down to match Polar.
I doubt if aw gets average bpm over the workout correct.
Polar gives me avearge and peak bpm and duration of workout.
I use heartwatch app. So far i cannot see how to get peak bpm
Anyway, if you want just heart rate monitoring get Polar ( mine cost $49 here)
If you want completeness and complexity and cost get AW