everything is backed up here at home and I have been using Carbonite as well for over a year, Love Carbonite, have had no issues
Carbonite is a disaster for Mac users.
CrashPlan hands down.
(actually it's CrashPlan+ for the online service)
Did much research and testing of all of them and CrashPlan+ is easily the best.
I have yet to try CrashPlan+, as that might be a viable option too, perhaps I'll check that out someday.
Howdy,
One reason I think I didn't try the CrashPlan+ option, was they didn't offer a monthly bill (at like $5-10/mo), but you had to commit to a full 1 year, same as with Carbonite which I also have not yet tried, if I recall correctly.
Cheers,
Yes BUT you can stop anytime and they'll give your momey back for the unused months
Howdy,
One reason I think I didn't try the CrashPlan+ option, was they didn't offer a monthly bill (at like $5-10/mo), but you had to commit to a full 1 year, same as with Carbonite which I also have not yet tried, if I recall correctly.
Cheers,
Daniel Feldman
=======================
MacMind
Certified Member of the
Apple Consultants Network
Apple Certified (ACHDS)
E-mail: Dan@MacMind.com
Phone: 1-408-454-6649
URL : www.MacMind.com
=======================
Tried installing Carbonite, the software on the Mac sucked. I ended up going with Mozy, and it is absolutely fantastic, really slick and reliable. Am backing up more now actually.
I would also be hesitant to go wtih Carbonite, because they are offering unlimited, which is not a sustainable business model. Mozy seems to have their business model down pat, and their technology is second to none.
For stuff I am working on that year, like documents and such, I use Dropbox, since I use it anyways for synchronization/ web access. For stuff like photos as well a older documents, I have Mozy. That is in addition to a drive that's in a fireproof safe, and a normal Time Machine drive that's at my laptop's docking spot.
EDIT: Also, Mozy offers a few months free when you pay for two years at a time.
carbonite sucks. yes, it has an incredible offer of backing up your entire hard drive. BUT, it only uploads a gigabyte or two a day. so, with 300 or so gigabytes of data, you are looking at nearly 1 YEAR before you have everything backed up. in the meantime, it is useless. i gave it a try for a week or so, and contacted them to ask if there was any way to speed it up, but all i got were form emails. no way.
I started using mozy back when there was only the one guy running it. I don't know how much different that is now but since they ditched their unlimited model earlier this year I had to ditch them. Don't assume that unlimited = unsustainable, it doesn't by any means.
Carbonite for me was easy to configure and worked just fine. And there is also crashplan which has unlimited online backups and will also backup to externals at the same time. So you get both options.
Also, dropbox has major security issues. You can read their latest TOS for yourself or listen to a recent episode of Security Now where they cover this in detail.
Better to use spideroak or Waula.
Anyone else have Backblaze problems on a Lion upgrade? I couldn't figure out what was going on, so had to pay for someone to come look at it. After about an hour, he found BB snailing along on a 120GB backup on a HDD that was already fully backed up before the Lion conversion. So I turned it off, uninstalled the app and and the whole system woke up. Oddly, it wasn't showing up in the Activity Monitor as a resource hog.
Until you've done a complete successful restore of your data, you shouldn't be recommending anyone.
Anyone can throw bits out across the 'net... it's getting them back that's the complicated bit.
Who here has actually tested whether they can restore?
Just one little comment about all the positive recommendations of these vendors.
Until you've done a complete successful restore of your data, you shouldn't be recommending anyone.
Anyone can throw bits out across the 'net... it's getting them back that's the complicated bit.
Who here has actually tested whether they can restore?
I've done some limited tests with Backblaze, which I've been using for close to 5 months now. I have roughly 50GB backed up on Backblaze, and I've browsed through the tree online a few times to see if everything looks like it's there (it does look that way), and I've downloaded some limited sets of backed up data to see if random files selected from various places in the tree were actually usable (they all were).
I've never tried a full test, because downloading 50GB would not be fun on my 4G internet connection. But I've done enough spot checking to feel confident in the reliability of the solution, and at any rate, I don't see Backblaze (or any online backup solution) as a full backup plan. I see it as a fallback plan. If local backups have failed, or have somehow been lost or destroyed (incompetence/theft/disaster), then it's nice to know that my data is still safe on the Backblaze servers. Plus, my local (weekly) backups are certainly not as up to date as my Backblaze backup, which does automatic incremental backups every hour, or somewhere in that ballpark. If I do ever actually have to retrieve *everything* from Backblaze, I'll be going with the option of buying an external hard disk from them with my files on it.
No problems when I switched from SL to Lion, either, even when I was running the developer previews.