Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Chuchichan

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 17, 2010
343
2
Maryland
How long do we have to put up with this photo of the Beatles on Apple's main page? I mean really, what's the big deal? So, we can purchase Beatles music now? That's it? I'd rather see a photo of the MBA...
 

Chuchichan

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 17, 2010
343
2
Maryland
You had to be there.

Had to be where? At the Apple Store to listen to them play Beatles music all day? Apple could do anything and it would be "cool". Hell, they could put a photo of Barbara Streisand up and play her music at the store and it would make the news...
 

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Jul 11, 2003
27,397
12,521
How long do we have to put up with this photo of the Beatles on Apple's main page? I mean really, what's the big deal? So, we can purchase Beatles music now? That's it? I'd rather see a photo of the MBA...


You don't have to put up with anything. Why do you visit a site that annoys you?
 

chrono1081

macrumors G3
Jan 26, 2008
8,456
4,165
Isla Nublar
Had to be where? At the Apple Store to listen to them play Beatles music all day? Apple could do anything and it would be "cool". Hell, they could put a photo of Barbara Streisand up and play her music at the store and it would make the news...

I think he means you had to be alive whenever the music was popular. They were a huge success and people all over the world adored them.

I personally hate the Beatles but I can't deny they had a huge influence and were revolutionary for their time.
 

leekohler

macrumors G5
Dec 22, 2004
14,164
26
Chicago, Illinois
I like the Beatles just fine, but tend to like their songs much better when other people cover them. That said, I own not one single disc. I've heard those songs so many times, I don't think I could ever forget them.
 

Apple OC

macrumors 68040
Oct 14, 2010
3,667
4,328
Hogtown
Nothing wrong with keeping the Beatles up on Apple's Home page for a while ... the Air was getting a little old ... everyone knows the Airs are available.

How about some deals on their home page instead? :cool:
 

xlii

macrumors 68000
Sep 19, 2006
1,867
121
Millis, Massachusetts
"I want to hold your hand"... it sounds so innocent today... but back then it was hot stuff. The Beatles on the Ed Sullivan Show was big stuff. Back when you only had 3 choices (we had only 2) on TV... everyone watched.
 

63dot

macrumors 603
Jun 12, 2006
5,269
339
norcal
How long do we have to put up with this photo of the Beatles on Apple's main page? I mean really, what's the big deal? So, we can purchase Beatles music now? That's it? I'd rather see a photo of the MBA...

While one of the great bands of rock and roll history, the nasty and expensive lawsuit between Apple Corps and Apple Inc. is also why this is a big deal. Many probably thought the Beatles would never be on iTunes (or that Paul and Yoko would own Apple Inc.) :eek:
 

LordDixon

macrumors newbie
Oct 2, 2010
24
0
When I was a kid I heard The Beatles. You could find all their songs almost anywhere and it was all free. Now thirty years later you have to pay for it, and it cost more now than it did when The Beatles were producing it. So I agree. What's the big deal? I open the Apple home page and hope to see news about iOS 4.2 update for iPad, or more about the upcoming OS X Lion. Instead it's The Beatles.

I'll be so happy when this fascination wears off. Hopefully they have already changed the page while I'm posting this.
 

wvuwhat

macrumors 65816
Sep 26, 2007
1,157
37
I'm all for having the Beatle's catalog on iTunes. I know many people have been waiting for this, but for christ's sake don't have it front and center after I've visited three times. Apple should take tabs on those that don't click on the Beatles "banner" after a few times visiting the Apple store.
 

Tomorrow

macrumors 604
Mar 2, 2008
7,160
1,364
Always a day away
I'm all for having the Beatle's catalog on iTunes. I know many people have been waiting for this, but for christ's sake don't have it front and center after I've visited three times. Apple should take tabs on those that don't click on the Beatles "banner" after a few times visiting the Apple store.

You could make the same argument when they show a new MacBook Air for a week on the main page, or the iPhone 4 for over a month, or whatever other product is new.

Is this really about what Apple puts on its home page, or is it just *sigh* more Beatles hate?
 
Last edited:

Designer Dale

macrumors 68040
Mar 25, 2009
3,950
100
Folding space
When I was a kid I heard The Beatles. You could find all their songs almost anywhere and it was all free. Now thirty years later you have to pay for it, and it cost more now than it did when The Beatles were producing it. So I agree. What's the big deal? I open the Apple home page and hope to see news about iOS 4.2 update for iPad, or more about the upcoming OS X Lion. Instead it's The Beatles.

I'll be so happy when this fascination wears off. Hopefully they have already changed the page while I'm posting this.

If it's info on software updates and stuff like that, you know where to look. And it's not the Apple Inc homepage...:cool:

Dale
 

Chundles

macrumors G5
Jul 4, 2005
12,037
493
Album sales 2009:

1. Michael Jackson
2. Daylight but technically Taylor Swift
3. The Beatles

Biggest selling group of 2009 with the release of their remastered albums on CD.

Opens up a considerable revenue stream.
 

roadbloc

macrumors G3
Aug 24, 2009
8,784
215
UK
iTunes getting the Beatles is possibly one of the biggest agreements in the music industry this decade. Whereas the techy forums couldn't care less, the music industry forums and sites were exploding with excitment at the time. And still are.
 

glocke12

macrumors 6502a
Jan 7, 2008
999
6
It is significant, but I dont think its as significant as people are making it out to be.

Now, if it were CD quality downloads than THAT would be significant (and yes, I can tell the difference. IT is subtle, but its enough to bother me).
 

George Knighton

macrumors 65816
Oct 13, 2010
1,391
346
I mean really, what's the big deal?

It's likely that most people posting here will be too young to know what the Big Deal was and is. :)

Mr Jobs is just the right age to think the Beatles were and are a huge, huge deal inasmuch as they epitomised two huge awakenings in the English speaking world, one in the 60's and one in the 70's.

I mean, let's think about what was going on in this era.

In the USA, you had the civil rights movement, the Kennedy brothers, and the beginning of a Vietnam War that would tear apart American society.

In the UK, you had a number of huge social and political revolutions. You guys aren't old enough to remember it, but the Heath vs Wilson fight resulted in The Queen's intervention on a number of occasions, it resulted in the nationalisation of a huge part of British industry, and there was a government on many occasions that was *so* socialist that you might as well have called it Communist.

100 years from now, we will be realising that the real democratisation of British society occurred during this current reign.
 

LordDixon

macrumors newbie
Oct 2, 2010
24
0
:mad:It's still there!
You could make the same argument when they show a new MacBook Air for a week on the main page, or the iPhone 4 for over a month, or whatever other product is new.
Yes you could, but no one did.:)

Is this really about what Apple puts on its home page, or is it just *sigh* more Beatles hate?
I wouldn't say it's about Beatles "hate!" Just Beatles "not that excited about it."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.