Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mxulive

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Oct 4, 2010
22
0
Canada
Some of you have probably seen the article by Macworld where they do a formal benchmark of the new MBA against the current MBP lineup. The 13" 1.86 GHz MBA managed a CoD4 framerate of 40 fps, while the 13" MBP only managed 33 fps... a difference of 20%!

I was wondering what the cause of this is given that both machines have an identical GPU and the MBP has a faster processor. Can the SSD actually increase gaming performance?

More importantly, do you guys think this performance difference will transfer over to other games? Will the 1.86 GHz MBA perform 20% better than the 13" MBP for SC2?

Link to Macworld article: http://www.macworld.com/article/154596/2010/10/macbookair_benchmarks.html?lsrc=rss_main
 
The mechanical hard drive is always the limiting bottleneck in any computer. SSDs remove that to some extent and allow the CPU/GPU to work to their full potential.
 
Some of you have probably seen the article by Macworld where they do a formal benchmark of the new MBA against the current MBP lineup. The 13" 1.86 GHz MBA managed a CoD4 framerate of 40 fps, while the 13" MBP only managed 33 fps... a difference of 20%!

I was wondering what the cause of this is given that both machines have an identical GPU and the MBP has a faster processor. Can the SSD actually increase gaming performance?

More importantly, do you guys think this performance difference will transfer over to other games? Will the 1.86 GHz MBA perform 20% better than the 13" MBP for SC2?

Link to Macworld article: http://www.macworld.com/article/154596/2010/10/macbookair_benchmarks.html?lsrc=rss_main

It could be that they used benchmarks from the MBP 13" last year which has outdated drivers.

SSD won't improve FPS which is a CPU & GPU operation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.