Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually I use virtual machines for 24 hours a day it means as long as I am using mac I will use WIN at the same time since I am a programmer.

A lots of guys here suggested me to go with 4g then for ssd.

So I think I may go with that but any good rams corsair or hitache?

What O/S are the VMs running? I write MS software and I need to provide certain VMs with 4GB RAM + (meaning I need 6+ on my iMac and MBP). An example of this is a Win 2008 VM running SharePoint 2010, SQL 2008, VS2010, Office client 2010 and a DC.

I recently purchased a new iMac with 8GB RAM and put 2*4GB Hynix (cheap) DDR3 SO-DIMMS into my MBP. I also added a Intel 160GB SSD (G2). The only way to get anything approaching 'really good' performance is to give the VM about 5.5GB and run it on the SSD (which is why I went for 160GB and not 80GB). Even then its just a little disappointing... but for a Win 7 VM running Office etc I think you could get away with 4GB RAM and a SSD.
 
Actually I use virtual machines for 24 hours a day it means as long as I am using mac I will use WIN at the same time since I am a programmer.

A lots of guys here suggested me to go with 4g then for ssd.

So I think I may go with that but any good rams corsair or hitache?

I've been very happy with RAM I've bought from OWC.

On the SSD side, I would avoid Crucial. The support/communication from the company is not very good right now. Track the Crucial SSD forums if you are considering them for SSD.

Here's another "it depends" answers. If your Windows VM needs a lot of RAM, then go for the 8gb first. Generally, I keep my VM's pretty lean, around 512-768mb ram. But then, I'm doing limited things with most of them. OTOH, the VM I run my Netbackup console in has a higher requirement for RAM, so that bugger has 3gb allocated.

Again, it's all about avoiding going to the HDD to being with. So first allocate sufficient RAM to spend most of your time off the HDD and then optimize HDD performance.

On the SSD side, I sprung for 256gb for my MBP as I have 50+gb tied up in one VM alone, so my VM disks are chewing though a lot of space. For the most part, I would say to go as large as you can so you don't have to truck around an external HDD.

If using an external HDD is okay for your situation, then running VM's off FW800 should be fine. Actually, even FW400 worked decently for most of my needs.

Just some more thoughts for your consideration.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.