Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

DeVizardofOZ

macrumors regular
Original poster
Check this comparison out: http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740

I find the comparison extreme well done. No BS. Some issues have not been tapped as much as I would have liked, that is:

less vertical pixels 900 vs 960 🙁
no FW800 😡
no DL DVD RW 😡
only 2 USBs 😡

The article points out CLEARLY, that processor swapping is a NO NO (soldered, not socketed 😡

😀
 
Here's the comparison that matters to folks who work on their MBPs-

01-aftereffects.jpg


and

02-photoshop.jpg


From Creative Mac.

You would not want to see how a rev. E PB G4 compares... It is ugly...

BB
 
DeVizardofOZ said:
Check this comparison out: http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740

I find the comparison extreme well done. No BS. Some issues have not been tapped as much as I would have liked, that is:

less vertical pixels 900 vs 960 🙁
no FW800 😡
no DL DVD RW 😡
only 2 USBs 😡

The article points out CLEARLY, that processor swapping is a NO NO (soldered, not socketed 😡

😀

What? 2 USB? PB G4 also had only 2 USB ports?😱 😕
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.