T TH55 macrumors 68040 Original poster Nov 5, 2011 3,328 152 Sep 17, 2015 #26 DeltaMac said: You can search this info out for yourself, you know... The difference will be greater as you view on larger screens. When you go bigger than 60-inches - there's just no contest at all. Click to expand... Cool, thanks.
DeltaMac said: You can search this info out for yourself, you know... The difference will be greater as you view on larger screens. When you go bigger than 60-inches - there's just no contest at all. Click to expand... Cool, thanks.
Mr. Retrofire macrumors 603 Mar 2, 2010 5,064 519 www.emiliana.cl/en Sep 17, 2015 #27 TH55 said: Is the Extreme still going to be significantly faster than standard drives even on a 2.0 port? Click to expand... If you use one of the USB 3.0 capable operating systems, then yes. Why? USB 3.0 capable systems use newer drivers which optimize also USB 2.0 data transfers.
TH55 said: Is the Extreme still going to be significantly faster than standard drives even on a 2.0 port? Click to expand... If you use one of the USB 3.0 capable operating systems, then yes. Why? USB 3.0 capable systems use newer drivers which optimize also USB 2.0 data transfers.
tinapanpan macrumors newbie Aug 20, 2014 26 3 Oct 27, 2015 #28 SanDisk, Kingston. I prefer Kingston. I have used Kingston for more that 3 years.