Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
^^^ I will be getting a 512gb Crucial MX100 here shortly. Plans are to clone my 7200 500gb HDD to the MX100 due to already having Parallels and all my Window's stuff on it, along with 10.10.2 w/ developer updates. Will probably go ahead and run Trim Enabler as I'm worried about slow downs over time w/out Trim Enabled. Will just have to remember to disable each time I update the OS.

This will be on a Mid 2009
 
@SaturnX,

Thats a few questions there. I'll summarise my experience. I have yet to upgrade to an SSD but am about to. The conclusion is, get a 1TB SSD if you can afford it and leave the optical bay alone. Otherwise, read on:

On the efi firmware issue with this macbook:
If you're on Snow Leopard, everything works well with efi 1.6 (and 1.7 i believe).
If you're on Lion or anything above that, you should downgrade to efi 1.6 (as 1.7 has issues).
However, on the latter point versions of Mavericks (can't remember which one), you begin to have issues with 1.6 again (and need to upgrade back to 1.7). So if you're on the latest Mavericks, 1.7 it is.
I don't know about Yosemite but I expect it will be the same as Mavericks.
In summary, you should have both installers somewhere, in case an update changes things and need to upgrade/downgrade. Also notice that this is primarily a hardware issue that Apple never acknowledged, so different macbook pro mid-2009 (even though they are exactly the same, might behave differently due to not having the exact same component).

As for the boot SSD. I would prefer to put it in the optical bay, but there are issues with that (something to do with safe sleep and the scratch disk), so you're better of putting your boot drive in the main hd bay. Even if those issues don't bother you (you may be able to get around them), you should still do it all the same because:
1. You might accidentally eject your boot drive by pressing the eject button on the keyboard (not a good thing).
2. You can take advantage of the eject button to eject the old HD when you need more battery whilst on the go. Most people will not miss the dvd drive, but they will miss the long battery life. The eject button takes care of that. You can easily remount it using disk utility, making a script, terminal alias, etc...

As for the type of SSD, crucial and samsung come recommended. As for the size: With modern SSDs you should go for at least 256GB, with older SSDs you can go down to 128GB. This is because the SSD speed for sequential write changes (from 100 to 500 mb/s) as their size changes. Older SSDs tend to have better sequential write speeds for 128GB. Note however that it is the random write speeds that you will benefit from.
Having said all that, your best bet is to just go for the cheapest SSD you can get your hands on and, depending on your use, 256GB. A light user might be happy with less, a heavy user will need the extra space (primarily to use as a scratch disk or cache for 2D/3D/video editing but also development (server cache, etc...).

As for whether you really need one. I'd say that if you're a happy user of Snow Leopard or Mountain Lion (you should not use Lion), than you probably don't need an SSD. If you're using Mavericks or above, you will start to notice a need. Modern OSs are starting to write to disk much more, now that SSDs are becoming commonplace.
 
I am also looking to upgrade my MBP 5,5 (mid 2009) with a new SSD. Inside is the SATA 2 controller NVidia MCP79. As mentioned in the thread, it does not play nicely with most SATA 3 SSDs and clocks down their "negotiated link speed" to SATA 1 (1.5Gb/s) instead of SATA 2 (3Gb/s).

@joaopl, @SaturnX and @got556 - which SSD did you ultimately choose and were you able to get SATA 2 (3Gb/s) speeds in the MBP 2009?
 
I chose the Samsung 850 EVO for my MacBook Pro mid 2009 (with the NVidia MCP79 chipset). It was a close call vs. the Crucial MX200. But the Samsung 850 EVO is supposedly faster and more energy efficient according to reviews.

I can confirm that I am getting a "negotiated link speed" of 3Gb/s (SATA 2).
Blackmagic speed test:
210MB/s - write
267MB/s - read

The machine is performing much better. Faster boot-up and apps launch. Lower CPU usage. Happy with it so far.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.