BGR's article today?

Jetcat3

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 3, 2015
619
352
Have any of you seen the report that the 6s Plus will feature a 2K display and the 6s will feature a 1080P display? Interesting. Thoughts?
 

Jetcat3

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 3, 2015
619
352
Yeah, I'm not so sure I believe it. I would like to see the 6 get a 1080P display, and have the 6 Plus stick with the 1080P display as well. The 6 Plus is almost rendering at 2K though. Who knows. My guess is that they stay the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darrensk8

rockitdog

macrumors 68030
Mar 25, 2013
2,502
863
I could see that in the redesign of the iPhone 7 but not for the next iteration unless Apple skips the the "S" series this year... camera spec update, and RAM bump would be enough to make most people happy, IMO. I still think we will see the return of a 4" iphone this year too. Can't say why I think this, but I think it will happen.
 
Last edited:

nepalisherpa

macrumors 68020
Aug 15, 2011
2,134
1,064
USA
I doubt that they are going to change screen resolution this soon. They don't want to piss developers off. Plus, 2K on a phone is just stupid (IMO). I see no advantage on my Note 4 vs my iPhone 6+.
 

soupcan

macrumors 6502a
Nov 21, 2014
725
2,926
Netherlands
Why 2K? You can't see the pixels anyway right now so why upgrade? Honestly, there's no use for ultra HD displays on such small displays, unless it's for something like an Oculus Rift. 1080p is fine on 5.5", everything that goes higher requires more power to drive which means less battery life. Making a better looking display, that's where the money's at and Apple knows that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABC5S

cambookpro

Contributor
Feb 3, 2010
6,757
2,353
United Kingdom
I don't think it will, but I think it certainly could happen. I'd even say it would be likely for the iP7. Wouldn't require developers to do anything either.

If they boost it to 1242 x 2208, then it will no longer have to downsample everything to the 1080p display. Performance may actually increase, though that sounds slightly counter intuitive. I'm not sure what the effect on battery life would be, but I don't imagine it would be massive; 1080p to 2K isn't a massive jump.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I think it's plausible.
 

nj-morris

macrumors 68000
Nov 30, 2014
1,739
638
UK
If anything, I think we will see the native 2208x1242 on the plus to solve downscaling issues and less likely an @3x (2000x1125) on the normal one. I think that's the best we can hope for. I always thought that normal retina (@2x) was fine enough, and anything above @3x retina is completely pointless. I've sort of got used to QHD on smartphones, but I originally thought it was really dumb, and I still do. If companies go for FQHD (4K) I really won't know what to say.
 

Andres Cantu

macrumors 68030
May 31, 2015
2,927
5,499
Rio Grande Valley in South Texas
I think it could go either way. If force touch requires redesigning a lot of the components from the displays, I could see them increasing the resolution this year. It would be weird to have 750p 4.7" and 1080p 5.5" force touch displays this year only to have 1080p 4.7" and 1440p 5.5" force touch displays for the iPhone 7/7+ and 7s/7s+ for 2016 and 2017. It will be very interesting to find out because the "S" models have always had the exact same displays as the regular models, so this year will be different in one way or the other. Maybe they will call the next iPhone the iPhone 7 and not the iPhone 6s?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.