Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Seems the 2TB is a little slower than the 512GB and 1TB, not by a lot though.

Did a reboot and made sure all apps were closed, after multiple tests this was the quickest, running 26.2.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0182.jpeg
    IMG_0182.jpeg
    191.9 KB · Views: 8
Would it make a huge difference in real world ?
It depends on what you're doing, for example.

I only shoot photos with Adobe Indigo. On my previous iPhone 16 Pro, it would take 2-4 seconds for photos to process and save. With my 17 Pro 512GB version, photos save almost instantly, at most maybe 1.5 seconds to process and save.

Another scenario is editing photos in Lightroom Mobile; depending on what you're doing, it can at times take some time to save a photo and export it to your camera roll. I've noticed that everything just processes and saves a lot faster than on my 16 Pro.

Is it a world of difference? Not really, but it's nice to have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tsepz
It depends on what you're doing, for example.

I only shoot photos with Adobe Indigo. On my previous iPhone 16 Pro, it would take 2-4 seconds for photos to process and save. With my 17 Pro 512GB version, photos save almost instantly, at most maybe 1.5 seconds to process and save.

Another scenario is editing photos in Lightroom Mobile; depending on what you're doing, it can at times take some time to save a photo and export it to your camera roll. I've noticed that everything just processes and saves a lot faster than on my 16 Pro.

Is it a world of difference? Not really, but it's nice to have.
one thing i've found with my older galaxy s8, pixel 7 and now pixel 9 pro is that the date modified usually is a few seconds off from the date taken, this "lag" i am assuming is from post-processing saving to internal storage so with higher read/write speeds this lag will be alot more narrowd ? Do you have 512 GB iphone 17 pro or base 17 with higher ssd to test and see the difference ?
 
It depends on what you're doing, for example.

I only shoot photos with Adobe Indigo. On my previous iPhone 16 Pro, it would take 2-4 seconds for photos to process and save. With my 17 Pro 512GB version, photos save almost instantly, at most maybe 1.5 seconds to process and save.

Another scenario is editing photos in Lightroom Mobile; depending on what you're doing, it can at times take some time to save a photo and export it to your camera roll. I've noticed that everything just processes and saves a lot faster than on my 16 Pro.

Is it a world of difference? Not really, but it's nice to have.

I reckon the faster speed is more thanks to the chipset rather than storage.

Writing a 100MB file takes 0.1s at 1GB/s and 0.03s at 3GB/s.
 
one thing i've found with my older galaxy s8, pixel 7 and now pixel 9 pro is that the date modified usually is a few seconds off from the date taken, this "lag" i am assuming is from post-processing saving to internal storage so with higher read/write speeds this lag will be alot more narrowd ? Do you have 512 GB iphone 17 pro or base 17 with higher ssd to test and see the difference ?
Unfortunately not, I just have my 17 Pro 512GB.

The tests I mentioned was done when I still had my 16 Pro 512GB before I sent it back to AT&T.
 
I reckon the faster speed is more thanks to the chipset rather than storage.

Writing a 100MB file takes 0.1s at 1GB/s and 0.03s at 3GB/s.
Oh for sure, the new A19 definitely helps with all this as well.
 
It depends on what you're doing, for example.

I only shoot photos with Adobe Indigo. On my previous iPhone 16 Pro, it would take 2-4 seconds for photos to process and save. With my 17 Pro 512GB version, photos save almost instantly, at most maybe 1.5 seconds to process and save.

Another scenario is editing photos in Lightroom Mobile; depending on what you're doing, it can at times take some time to save a photo and export it to your camera roll. I've noticed that everything just processes and saves a lot faster than on my 16 Pro.

Is it a world of difference? Not really, but it's nice to have.
If i go from a 256 gb 17 pro to 512 gb base 17 ...is the photos going to savr much more quickly from pressing the shutter button to saving the photos to library hence making the date modified timestamp of the photo closer to the actual date taken ?
 
If i go from a 256 gb 17 pro to 512 gb base 17 ...is the photos going to savr much more quickly from pressing the shutter button to saving the photos to library hence making the date modified timestamp of the photo closer to the actual date taken ?
If you can, go to your nearest Apple Store and test, the difference may not be huge.

Coming from 15 Pro Max 512GB to 17 Pro Max 512GB, I do notice faster saving of longer videos and saving of images I take while recording the video but they may also be due to A19 Pro just processing everything faster vs. the A17 Pro.
 
Man, if your photo saves on a different date than it was taken, I would check if you weren’t accidentally using an old analogue Leica camera instead of your iPhone. 😜
you can test yourself, import your photos from your iphone to pc and take the difference between date modified and date taken you will see it might be off by a few seconds
 
If you can, go to your nearest Apple Store and test, the difference may not be huge.

Coming from 15 Pro Max 512GB to 17 Pro Max 512GB, I do notice faster saving of longer videos and saving of images I take while recording the video but they may also be due to A19 Pro just processing everything faster vs. the A17 Pro.
I have gone many times but usually they had 256 gb on display. I will double chefk again when i get the chance to see if 512 gb is any different
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.