Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You are not getting it. The watch can be THINNER once you remove the battery and put it into the bands. The thickness really is off-putting to a lot of users. Look at the tremendous effort of slimming down the iPhone at Apple. That bulky Apple Watch is a turn off (along with the small screen). Moving the battery to the band will slim it down AND give it a long lasting life per charge. Do you know how heavy a Gold Rolex or whatever luxury brand is? Heaviness is NOT a factor for watches. For Apple products, thinness is the rage (look at iPhone...), and the MOST important factor (besides the small watch LED/LCD size). Why do you think large iPhones sell more than small iPhone screens? Stop moving backwards into the past and move into the future of thin design and long lasting battery life.
Is this a bit?
 
This is a science fiction idea with absolutely no real-world practicality in mind.

EyePhone.gif
 
Funnily enough quite a while back I toyed with a similar projection concept except instead of a smartwatch it was for a smartphone. Developing such an idea into a useable product had many challenges that prevented it from being practical.

- A projector needs a proper surface to cast the image, the projection device I used was pocket-sized and it struggled to produce a non-distorted image on anything other than a dedicated projection screen, much less on someone's body or arms. Even large non-portable projectors struggle with this.
- You're going to need a very powerful bulb. Projectors work best in a dark room and if you're going outside in daylight then the image is pretty much invisible.
- Bright bulbs consume a lot of power, the device I had was equipped with a battery roughly twice the size of an iPhone, but even then it could only supply enough power for a maximum of 2 hours. If a larger battery is added, it wouldn't be practical to wear on your wrist.
- Projector bulbs get hot. You do NOT want a hot projector bulb mounted to your wrist.
- Projectors take a few seconds to warm up, so having a projector power up to display something for 15 seconds and then power down constantly would be tricky.
- A projector is a display-only device and cannot accept inputs. Even if you could project anywhere reliably, you wouldn't be able to interact with the interface. The only solution would be to use the watch as a trackpad.

That being said, I can 100% see Apple integrating their watch with the Vision Pro, probably offering an AR extended interface for the watch.
 
I'm with you. The initial post had me think "troll? maaaaybe...." and later posts turned that into "this is just a post to get reactions". Is there a point system here that takes in to account replies to an original post or something??

-dan
Yeah but coming up with all those nonsensical theories takes quite a bit of effort, just to get some reactions, don’t you think?
 
I know that Apple Watch has been out for a long time. But have you noticed that it has almost no traction compared to the iPhone? Do you know why? The stupid screen is too small. Nobody enjoys squinting at a tiny screen when they have the Time on a big iPhone screen to appreciate. The other big problem is that the battery life is too short on a single charge. Can you imaging going on a weeks trips and the watch dies because you can't charge it? What do you do if you are in the desert hiking for a week? No more time keeping? It is not like you can easily connect a usb-c cable to it either. The proprietary power connections really hinders its acceptance as a "watch" because people do happen to travel all over the world with a watch (notice the different time zones on the turnable dial fixture for many popular non-digital brands). OK. Enough of this gripe. I will tell you now the two main points of this post.

1) Apple needs to take out the battery and put it in the bands. You can have 5 or six segments for the band and each segment is mini-battery. It can even be designed to match the rugged 2-tone steel/gold bands of Rolex and others. This would increase the battery life on a single charge to match that of iPhones. Short battery life is BAD BAD BAD.

2) Use a different display technology to offset the small real estate of the watch face. For example, make a small projector inside that can project onto a wall or your chest or hands, or ANYWHERE so that you actually see a larger image (at a minimum project light at least to the size of the iPhone clearly). For example, with the watch on, make a gesture or sound and the projector beams a display for 15 seconds (adjustable) that you can then project anywhere. Or even wirelessly send the image to your fashionable Rayband digital image enabled sunglasses (maybe apple's ar glasses if it is not too bulky).

Meh.

My Ultra is, hands-down, a vastly superior smartphone to the original iPhone (which was itself a revolutionary smartphone when released). The case is smaller and lighter than many mechanical watches, especially the much-prized and crazy expensive Rolex Submariner. The display is gorgeous. Sure, it’s smaller than that of a phone — but, again, its functionality blows that of early smartphones out of the water. I have not even the slightest hint of trouble texting, checking emails, navigating with maps … calendar, weather, workouts, shopping lists, phone calls (it’s a better speakerphone than my iPhone Xs was!), ApplePay, alarms and stopwatches and timers … and and and …

And the battery? It goes on the charger when I hop in the shower; when I’m done, it’s at least to 80%, which will typically be down to about 40-50% by the next day’s shower. I’m not going more than a day without showering, or showering somewhere without power … but, even so, I could trivially skip a day and still have charge. If I need more than that, the watch running out of battery is the least of my concerns.

I don’t want batteries in the bands. I want to be able to put on a cheap-but-nice leather band without worrying about the watch dying. I don’t want to project my watch onto the nearest wall for everybody to see. I don’t want to have to stand in front of a wall to read my email. I don’t want to try to read my email on my chest. And I certainly don’t want a half-pound hand-sized “watch” with a built-in DLP projector strapped to my wrist.

You’re on the right track at the end. The VisionPro — or, rather, its first descendant that’s ready for all-day wearing — will obviate the need for a watch. And, not just a watch and not just a phone … not just laptops, but desktops. Those doing text entry that’s more than a SMS message at a time will still likely want a physical keyboard, but that’s it.

b&
 
But have you noticed that it has almost no traction compared to the iPhone?
That is hilarious. I cannot go anywhere without seeing them everywhere. If you watch any tv, news shows, local as well as national broadcasts you’ll see them on almost all of the anchors and hosts. Even my older unsophisticated neighbors have just mentionedd they will be getting them. So traction has been nothing short of awe inspiring.

However I do agree that a larger device that would extend up the arm a bit similar to communicators that I’ve seen used in sci-fi programs. As battery technology improves this may become a reality and I hope Apple continues in this direction. There are many times I go out without my phone, just with my Ultra, and I can see the day when this will be the norm for me. I don’t see bands containing batteries being viable as I and many others, I believe, rotate my bands weekly washing them in the shower with me. After a week of use while working out in the summer they can be pretty grimy. I don’t see washing a battery band in the shower, nor having several on hand to rotate through.
 
I know that Apple Watch has been out for a long time. But have you noticed that it has almost no traction compared to the iPhone? Do you know why? The stupid screen is too small. Nobody enjoys squinting at a tiny screen when they have the Time on a big iPhone screen to appreciate. The other big problem is that the battery life is too short on a single charge. Can you imaging going on a weeks trips and the watch dies because you can't charge it? What do you do if you are in the desert hiking for a week? No more time keeping? It is not like you can easily connect a usb-c cable to it either. The proprietary power connections really hinders its acceptance as a "watch" because people do happen to travel all over the world with a watch (notice the different time zones on the turnable dial fixture for many popular non-digital brands). OK. Enough of this gripe. I will tell you now the two main points of this post.

1) Apple needs to take out the battery and put it in the bands. You can have 5 or six segments for the band and each segment is mini-battery. It can even be designed to match the rugged 2-tone steel/gold bands of Rolex and others. This would increase the battery life on a single charge to match that of iPhones. Short battery life is BAD BAD BAD.

2) Use a different display technology to offset the small real estate of the watch face. For example, make a small projector inside that can project onto a wall or your chest or hands, or ANYWHERE so that you actually see a larger image (at a minimum project light at least to the size of the iPhone clearly). For example, with the watch on, make a gesture or sound and the projector beams a display for 15 seconds (adjustable) that you can then project anywhere. Or even wirelessly send the image to your fashionable Rayband digital image enabled sunglasses (maybe apple's ar glasses if it is not too bulky).
They already make this product. It’s called a Garmin watch. Batteries last weeks to a month.
 
Yeah but coming up with all those nonsensical theories takes quite a bit of effort, just to get some reactions, don’t you think?
Sometimes a creative person has ideas no one else likes. Usually it's because there's a fatal flaw the creative was blind to, but sometimes it's because no one gets the creative's inspired vision. We have to let the ideas be aired to suss out which is which.
 
Just my opinion, but this is laughable! It is a watch. It is a device where people take a quick look at it, maybe press the screen a couple of times and that’s it.

You keep going on about your de facto solutions, however what I believe you fail to realise is there is actually no problem in the first place for the absolute vast vast vast majority of owners.

Also, it is the best selling watch on the planet and nothing you are coming out with is based, in my opinion anyway, in any form of reality. You are inventing issues where no issues exist.

Oh and your “fix”: far from easy.
Agreed. At the risk of sounding mean, the battery/band idea is <INSERT SPACE FOR THOUGHTFUL REFLECTION> completely stupid. It solves no real problem that anyone cares about. Yes, battery life is limited. So, you charge it while you sleep. You wake up and there you go. When I travel, it is just one more cable that I carry with me. Having some stupid, heavy watch band is more irritating. I don't know what this person is doing with their Apple Watch that they need a huge screen. I interact with the screen for two seconds at a time to get information. I'm not writing an email or reading a webpage. And yes, there is already a solution for the "problem" and it is Apple Watch Ultra. It has a huge battery and a huge screen. Done!
 
I know that Apple Watch has been out for a long time. But have you noticed that it has almost no traction compared to the iPhone?
No, I haven't noticed "almost no traction". As a matter of fact, I see people with Apple Watches everywhere. Obviously, it's never going to be as common as iPhone, because there's a large percentage of people who don't need a smartwatch at all, even though they do need a phone. But the people who do need a watch, often tend to get AW.

Especially at work meetings, I see people with AW's everywhere. I'd say Garmin is also pretty popular, but not nearly as much. Android watches are rare. I travel a lot and visit different companies all the time, so it's a pretty large sample.
 
I just want fitness tracker and see the notifications.
Remove all of the app nonsense and have the battery life inherently increased to a couple days, done
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ta_whirimatea
I know that Apple Watch has been out for a long time. But have you noticed that it has almost no traction compared to the iPhone? Do you know why? The stupid screen is too small. Nobody enjoys squinting at a tiny screen when they have the Time on a big iPhone screen to appreciate. The other big problem is that the battery life is too short on a single charge. Can you imaging going on a weeks trips and the watch dies because you can't charge it? What do you do if you are in the desert hiking for a week? No more time keeping? It is not like you can easily connect a usb-c cable to it either. The proprietary power connections really hinders its acceptance as a "watch" because people do happen to travel all over the world with a watch (notice the different time zones on the turnable dial fixture for many popular non-digital brands). OK. Enough of this gripe. I will tell you now the two main points of this post.

1) Apple needs to take out the battery and put it in the bands. You can have 5 or six segments for the band and each segment is mini-battery. It can even be designed to match the rugged 2-tone steel/gold bands of Rolex and others. This would increase the battery life on a single charge to match that of iPhones. Short battery life is BAD BAD BAD.

2) Use a different display technology to offset the small real estate of the watch face. For example, make a small projector inside that can project onto a wall or your chest or hands, or ANYWHERE so that you actually see a larger image (at a minimum project light at least to the size of the iPhone clearly). For example, with the watch on, make a gesture or sound and the projector beams a display for 15 seconds (adjustable) that you can then project anywhere. Or even wirelessly send the image to your fashionable Rayband digital image enabled sunglasses (maybe apple's ar glasses if it is not too bulky).

I disagree completely. I dumped the AW due to the bugs in the software. I also found the watch uncomfortable to wear and standard band “icky”.

1. Fix the bugs with notifications. The killer app is making sure you don’t have to take out your watch.
2. Make a round version that is more comfortable to wear.
3. Swap the “sport” band for a standard cloth or metal band.
4. Open up the watch faces in the SDK.
5. Make the app experience better on a small screen: big BIG buttons.

6. Find a way to have a great-Apple esk experience with a touch screen that is wet or under water.

IMO, all the heath stuff should be in the background and not primary.
 
I know that Apple Watch has been out for a long time. But have you noticed that it has almost no traction compared to the iPhone? Do you know why? The stupid screen is too small. Nobody enjoys squinting at a tiny screen when they have the Time on a big iPhone screen to appreciate. The other big problem is that the battery life is too short on a single charge. Can you imaging going on a weeks trips and the watch dies because you can't charge it? What do you do if you are in the desert hiking for a week? No more time keeping? It is not like you can easily connect a usb-c cable to it either. The proprietary power connections really hinders its acceptance as a "watch" because people do happen to travel all over the world with a watch (notice the different time zones on the turnable dial fixture for many popular non-digital brands). OK. Enough of this gripe. I will tell you now the two main points of this post.

1) Apple needs to take out the battery and put it in the bands. You can have 5 or six segments for the band and each segment is mini-battery. It can even be designed to match the rugged 2-tone steel/gold bands of Rolex and others. This would increase the battery life on a single charge to match that of iPhones. Short battery life is BAD BAD BAD.

2) Use a different display technology to offset the small real estate of the watch face. For example, make a small projector inside that can project onto a wall or your chest or hands, or ANYWHERE so that you actually see a larger image (at a minimum project light at least to the size of the iPhone clearly). For example, with the watch on, make a gesture or sound and the projector beams a display for 15 seconds (adjustable) that you can then project anywhere. Or even wirelessly send the image to your fashionable Rayband digital image enabled sunglasses (maybe apple's ar glasses if it is not too bulky).
1. Battery bands can burn hands. Lithium ion can be unstable, especially if you are hiking in a desert.
2. Use an iPhone for anything that needs a screen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
Interesting. My Apple Watch Ultra is perfect screen wise. Putting the battery in the band is a terrible idea. Imagine how terrible something so rigid will be on your wrist. The only thing they should do is keep improving battery life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN and 4389842
I know that Apple Watch has been out for a long time. But have you noticed that it has almost no traction compared to the iPhone? Do you know why? The stupid screen is too small. Nobody enjoys squinting at a tiny screen when they have the Time on a big iPhone screen to appreciate. The other big problem is that the battery life is too short on a single charge. Can you imaging going on a weeks trips and the watch dies because you can't charge it? What do you do if you are in the desert hiking for a week?

If you go hiking in the desert for a week where there is likely no cell reception and you’re planning on relying on your smart watch you’re probably doing it wrong…

No more time keeping? It is not like you can easily connect a usb-c cable to it either.

Ah yes, queue the ‘watch too big now’ stories. Did you ever think how large the UCB-c receptacle is compared to the each size? Not even mentioning IP rating.

Every major fitness watch uses a dock of some kind.

It can even be designed to match the rugged 2-tone steel/gold bands of Rolex and others.

Ah yes, those garish overpriced mechanical watches of yesteryear… not everyone likes those you know.

This would increase the battery life on a single charge to match that of iPhones. Short battery life is BAD BAD BAD.

My watch lasts me longer than my iPhone: where is that mythical multi day charge phone you speak of?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.