Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Bin Laden brother unveils £100bn plan for world's longest bridge

B

BoyBach

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Feb 24, 2006
3,031
13
It sounds like a joke. The brother of the world's most famous terrorist wants to build the world's longest suspension bridge, linking two continents across the world's most dangerous waters. As if that's not enough, he also plans to build two new cities – one at each end.

If Sheikh Tarek bin Laden is joking, it's an expensive gag. The Al Noor project will cost some $200bn (£100bn) and, according to Sheikh Bin Laden's people, he has already ploughed hundreds of millions of dollars into the scheme himself.

The project is nothing if not ambitious. A bridge, 18 miles long, will link Africa with Arabia across the Bab al-Mandib (Gate of Tears), the strait connecting the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden. Two cities, one in tiny Djibouti, the other in Yemen, will sit at either end.

The new metropolises, the Saudi developer claims, will be the envy of the world: the finest hospitals and schools, world-class universities and sporting facilities – everything will be the biggest and the best. Building them will require a staggering influx of migrant labour. The Djibouti city alone needs 850,000 workers – the country's entire population (children and babies included) is 800,000.

Once built, the two cities will be models for a further 98 Sheikh Bin Laden hopes to build worldwide. Where, he does not know. And, judging by the grand launch in Djibouti last month, it is a question he is unlikely to ever have to answer.

An odd mix of Djiboutian government officials, American military contractors and journalists gathered in the splendour of the Djibouti Kempinsky Palace, the country's sole five-star hotel, to watch hyperbolic promotional videos.

The project was compared to the construction of the Pyramids, the Garden of Eden and the Great Wall of China. It would be a "hope for all humanity". Whereas once people from around the world dreamed of one day living in America, soon they would hope and pray for a life in Djibouti, said the company's chief executive, Mohamed Ahmed al Ahmed.

The bridge linking the two continents would allow trade to blossom "from Dakar to Beijing", he said, ignoring the fact that Djibouti's best link to the rest of Africa is a 90-year-old railway that takes two days to travel 300 miles to the nearest city, Addis Ababa.

Without new transport infrastructure on both sides of the bridge, people will not be able to travel far. Maybe that's just as well. Djibouti's neighbours are not premiere business destinations. Ethiopia, the largest, is currently fighting three wars. Eritrea, to the north, is one of the most closed societies in the world and is currently engaged in a small border war with Djibouti. And then there is Somalia – a failed state and one of the world's worst humanitarian disasters.

Which makes it all the more curious that some major US companies with strong links to the Bush administration appear to be in charge of the project. The main contractors are a firm called L3 Communications, a company which styles itself as offering "global security and engineering solutions". It is also one of America's largest defence contractors and its senior staff includes retired military officials and Republican businessmen.

Sheikh Bin Laden may be the front man, but L3 seemed to be running the show. Experts lined up to answer questions after the video screenings were all working for US firms – some were former Bush administration officials. Even the chief executive, Mr Ahmed, has close American ties. He previously worked for another US defence contractor, DynCorp.

And yet, despite all the hype, the project does not appear to be particularly well thought through. No-one seemed to think it was a problem building two new cities in one of the most unstable regions in the world. Nor did anyone think it was a problem that neither country has enough water or food for its current population – the Djibouti city will raise the country's population from 800,000 to more than three million. One eighth of the current population is already in need of food aid, according to the World Food Programme.

Mr Ahmed claimed these were minor problems. Look at Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Doha, he insisted. But those cities were built on oil money. Neither Djibouti nor Yemen has any real income of its own. Djibouti's main exports are re-exports – it acts as a port and transportation hub for landlocked African countries. Yemen is the world's leading producer of myrrh.

So far, the project has no major investors. But Mr Ahmed said: "People will have doubts. But we will realise our dream."
Click to expand...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...bn-plan-for-worlds-longest-bridge-892880.html


The follies of rich men.


EDIT: Promotional video.
 
No plans or ideas to solve food and water requirements, nor how to end conflicts in the area. Even if it's built, what would it accomplish? :confused:
 
Seconded. I can only assume the words Bin & Laden are sending people into a tabloid frenzy. Nanofrog's point about stability and water goes somewhat to the heart of the matter though. Whilst the most intriguing and alarming aspect hasn't raised a single comment. What the F**K are the US military doing? Another glimpse of American covert global dominance before it disappears into the ether?
 
Henri Gaudier said:
Seconded. I can only assume the words Bin & Laden are sending people into a tabloid frenzy. Nanofrog's point about stability and water goes somewhat to the heart of the matter though. Whilst the most intriguing and alarming aspect hasn't raised a single comment. What the F**K are the US military doing? Another glimpse of American covert global dominance before it disappears into the ether?
Click to expand...
My take on the article indicated a corporate endeavor, rather than a military one. So I intentionally left out comments pertaining to military action. Nor do I like guilt by association, so don't consider Sheikh Tarek bin Laden a dangerous person.

If I interpreted the references to Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Doha, the area in question is not for oil production. There is no claim that the intent is to solve the resource availability or even human rights issues already facing these areas. So my main question, is "Why? What purpose would this serve?" The article states that there is no transportation infrastructure, so how would this serve any economic goals? :confused:

For me, it just seems there is no point, and would be a total waste of resources.

If anyone can clarify, I'd appreciate it. :)
 
This is really extraordinary…

If a bridge was proposed, say between Malaysia and Indonesia… or China and Taiwan (OK, Ok that ain't happening soon) or a dozen other places you could mention, it might be understandable and make some economic sense.

But there seems to be no rhyme or reason to join these two points.
It'd probably end up like this:
end-of-road.jpg


The American involvement just lends itself to sinister theories. :p

I wonder if this is what they envisage?
 

Attachments

  • Bridge.jpg
    Bridge.jpg
    380.2 KB · Views: 68
arkitect:
The whole idea doesn't make sense, to you either?
I liked the illustration, BTW.:)

Maybe they were all watching Field of Dreams, and were inspired by the line "If you build it they will come." To what, the rear end of nowhere? The whole idea is just stupid to me. I just don't see any logic whatsoever.
 
Have they considered plate tectonics? From what I can see, this bridge would join two continental plates, the African plate with with Arabian plate at the Red-Sea rift where the two plates are gradually moving away from each other.

If there are any Geologists out there, feel free to make me look like an idiot. This was just a thought I had.
 
xUKHCx said:
Basically yes, from the youtube video linked above
Click to expand...
Thanks! Ididn't see that one. Would have saved me a Photoshop. :p

nanofrog said:
arkitect:
The whole idea doesn't make sense, to you either?
I liked the illustration, BTW.:)

Maybe they were all watching Field of Dreams, and were inspired by the line "If you build it they will come." To what, the rear end of nowhere? The whole idea is just stupid to me. I just don't see any logic whatsoever.
Click to expand...

I agree it makes no sense to me. Zero. Zilch.

Ah yes, "If you build it they will come."
I like that. But somehow… :eek:
 
Sounds like a nice easy way to control all shipping using the Suez Canal without actually having to invade Egypt to me, hence the military backing.

However, it does sound completely doomed to failure IMO. The article already makes the point that Djibouti isn't really that well linked to the rest of Africa, and that Yemen is also a bit of a backwater in economic terms. I guess all the prime sites in the Persian Gulf have already been taken, so this was the best the Sheikh could come up with.
 
Dejavu said:
The African plate is moving northeast at about 25mm per year. Bridges are not rigid structures and probably would accommodate some movement of the bedrock below.
Click to expand...

I appreciate that bridges are not rigid structures, but as these are two divergent plates and the proposed bridge would be constructed over the geologically active red sea rift region, could it not pose a problem over time?
 
davidjearly said:
I appreciate that bridges are not rigid structures, but as these are two divergent plates and the proposed bridge would be constructed over the geologically active red sea rift region, could it not pose a problem over time?
Click to expand...
Since the plates are moving slowly over time, they may include a section where they can adjust the length of the bridge.
 
sushi said:
Since the plates are moving slowly over time, they may include a section where they can adjust the length of the bridge.
Click to expand...
Even then, what if the plates are moving in another direction, like rubbing against each other in opposite directions, adding that extra length wouldn't be all that much of a help then.

(But then again I do not know this area of science all that well.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back