I feel like I kind of missed the boat on this discussion, but I'll toss in my lot anyway.
furcalchick, I'm always amazed by people who call others failures for experiencing a shift in interests. It's like people expect someone to have their entire life mapped out by the time they hit university. I think you'll agree with me that this is complete bullsh*t. University is a time of personal growth where you learn as much about yourself as you do about your formal subject of study. It's definitely not a "failure" to question yourself. If anything, having the courage to simply pick something new after spending tens of thousands of dollars in college is indicative of extreme personal fortitude. Few people have the grit to follow their dreams and say "no" to parents, professors and peers. I, for one, applaud you
I'm the kind of person who takes broad interest in just about everything and I actually had some problems just last week regarding that. (PM me if you'd like to hear about that)
To relate to your moral/ethical problems with the pharmaceutical industry, I sympathise entirely with your point of view. Back when I was in Grade 12, I
really wanted to study biophysics, particularly with MRI applications. I did a little research before I applied to any universities, and my research indicated that something like 90% of biophysics graduates ended up designing drugs for pharmaceuticals. Whoops. My mind changed pretty quickly there...I was lucky to have figured that out so early. Instead, I started studying Mechanical Engineering, specialised in Mechatronics, and then moved on to German and eventually Quantum Physics. I'm on a work term with the Canadian Space Agency right now, but I still have no idea what I want to do with my life. I'm considering studying several other languages after finishing engineering, and then maybe getting an MBA. And then maybe doing some more engineering or sciences. And then...etc etc. Is that so wrong? If I'm not completely satisfied with where I am, I reserve the right to change. Likewise,
you should reserve the right to change.
Coming back from a different perspective, I am certain that I don't want to work for any morally objectionable corporation. But then, how will those corporations ever change for the better if all moral people are scared away? It's one of these self-reinforcing problems. I have no idea whether you want to change the world or simply avoid the parts you don't like, but it's something to think about if you're not completely convinced that leaving biology is right for you
Coming from yet another perspective, my uncle found himself in a perplexing situation back when he was an undergrad many years ago. He was having trouble figuring out what he wanted to do and refused to listen to professors who simply recommended their own fields. The difference is that one of his professors instead recommended that he disappear for a year. In paraphrase, he said "Take a year off and read. Read everything you can get your hands on. If anything even remotely catches your interest, read it. And then read some more. By the end of the year, you will know what you want to do." My uncle took that advice and decided on Geology. He's now living in Germany as one of the most respected geologists in the world. It's really all about finding your passion and enjoying doing it. If you're really not a fan of biotech (and not just against the biotech companies themselves), then I
urge you to do something different.
Anyway, that's probably enough for you. Hope that helped, if only in the slightest