yuc7zhd2 said:
Hmmm. I think you misunderstood his post somehow-
Paul is the resident sex expert and is well over 12 years old. And gay. I think you are a preachin to the choir.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
BJ as legal defense!!
- Thread starter Grimace
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Hmmm. I think you misunderstood his post somehow-
Paul is the resident sex expert and is well over 12 years old. And gay. I think you are a preachin to the choir.
MrMacman said:
Hmm. true. I guess there's just got to be some way to nail her for something. (no pun intended, okay maybe it was) Not that I'm against R.H. (thanks for the term paul) but I guess I just feel like the family of the victim ought to get some kind of retribution. Oh well. Not like its gonna bring him back anyway. I guess I just think she deserves her come-uppins. (ooooh, that one was bad. I need to go to bed.)
agreenster said:
Was there really a victim though? I suspect this fellow was a willing party. It's what he gets for being careless. I tend to believe the woman for a number of reasons. First, the very fact that she brought it up. I doubt someone would come up with an embarrassing story that will be openly discussed amongst many people. Loss of privacy, you think?. Also, it's very plausible. As our good paul whannel has said, this is actually not that unusual, and such actions are certainly not conducive to safe transportation. And last, that the prosecution would be so lame as to suggest this guy is going to try to urinate out the window or moon someone. I very much doubt it. Oh, he must have been sick. Yeah, I pull my pants down all the time when I'm sick. I'm guessing that with a woman in the car, he would be even less likely to have his pants down for these reasons than for another.
agreenster said:
very cute 'tar
so i'm the resident sex expert... read: whore. i'm so touched
road head may be common, but as mentioned above, it's not safe. The passenger at least, and possibly the driver, have to remove seat-belts. The driver is distracted, and the passenger obscures the controls (there's a joke in here somewhere, the punch line must be "she honked the horn with her forehead"). Anyhoo, having been on both ends of it, i still think this guy took a risk and lost... if the woman's story is true, she's quite lucky to be alive, i should think...
i don't know how accurate it is in the thread title, and all the press coverage, to say a BJ was used as a defense. Really it's just an alibis, and there have certainly been weirder
paul
paulwhannel said:very cute 'tar
so i'm the resident sex expert... read: whore. i'm so touched
sorry-I didnt mean it that way. I think that dude thought you were a kid getting grossed out by the thought of it. Anyway...
Yeah, the avatar is new, decided to update it now that we have the new boards. That spinning powerbook had been around a while. The turtle is my latest 3D project...
This should make for an interesting case to study in law school. I'm sure the students/profs will be able to ... attack it from several angles. After all, with so much at stake here, we would not want to just give the issue lip service. It really should be brought out into the open and the significance, exposed to the light of day.
Kyle? said:
But isn't she still negligent even if she was giving him one?
I mean she is quite responsible for his loss of control of the car as much as he was...
IMHO.
agreenster: i'm just playing, i thought it was hilarious
Not quite, because to be negligent, she would have to have had some responsibility for maintaining control of the vehicle-- but that's the driver's responsibility. But, there are probably laws on the books about distracting drivers, i think previous cases have actually been tried for involuntary manslaughter. I also seem to recall that several states have laws on the books about road head, or consider it part of public indecency/sex, but that wouldn't be a hefty sentence-- a misdemeanor, small fine. it'll be interesting to see if they try her for inv. manslaughter... the prosecution would have to assert that she knew she was directly risking his life, and she acted in reckless disregard for human life. i don't know if there's a jury that would convict for that one... or if the DA cares that much about this case.
paul
MrMacman said:
Not quite, because to be negligent, she would have to have had some responsibility for maintaining control of the vehicle-- but that's the driver's responsibility. But, there are probably laws on the books about distracting drivers, i think previous cases have actually been tried for involuntary manslaughter. I also seem to recall that several states have laws on the books about road head, or consider it part of public indecency/sex, but that wouldn't be a hefty sentence-- a misdemeanor, small fine. it'll be interesting to see if they try her for inv. manslaughter... the prosecution would have to assert that she knew she was directly risking his life, and she acted in reckless disregard for human life. i don't know if there's a jury that would convict for that one... or if the DA cares that much about this case.
paul
MrMacman, it's obviously a distraction the driver didn't have a problem with. I think it's a poor excuse to try someone for manslaughter when the person killed should have taken responsibility for their own life and stopped the action. Yeah, she was distracting, but he very likely didn't mind the distraction.
Counterfit said:A rim-something at least
I can't even begin to imagine the logistics of that one.