Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I was last night but I'm better this morning. :)

Gotta say I love the rolling panda avatar.

PS Just saw 'Edited for language'. Sorry, I could have sworn I put asterisks in. But how come the word 'bollocks' is freely acceptable in numerous posts but not s**t?

It blocks some cities as well, take S-c-u-n-t-h-o-r-p-e for example, it comes out as S****horpe
 
It blocks some cities as well, take S-c-u-n-t-h-o-r-p-e for example, it comes out as S****horpe
Well, it was done by Doctor Q. Maybe not enough *sterisk*.

Sydney, am I right? I spent some time in Newtown way back. Those were the days...
 
PS Just saw 'Edited for language'. Sorry, I could have sworn I put asterisks in. But how come the word 'bollocks' is freely acceptable in numerous posts but not s**t?
The list of words deemed inappropriate (which is updated from time to time) is one of those "community standards" issues for which there is no precise method of determination. We try to keep the site family-friendly for ages 13 and up, with admittedly mixed success.

As for asterisks, the rules do not permit bypassing the profanity filter by replacing selected letters with asterisks or similar-looking letters. If "foobar" was on the list, you would not be allowed to say foobar, f00bar, f**bar, foob@r, and so on. The software would catch only the first form automatically, so the moderators would have to clean up posts manually if the other forms were used, assuming the posts were noticed or reported. We would probably permit a one-letter version, e.g., f***** for foobar.

Sorry that I'm off-topic here, but it was a legitimate question deserving an answer.
 
The list of words deemed inappropriate (which is updated from time to time) is one of those "community standards" issues for which there is no precise method of determination. We try to keep the site family-friendly for ages 13 and up, with admittedly mixed success.

As for asterisks, the rules do not permit bypassing the profanity filter by replacing selected letters with asterisks or similar-looking letters. If "foobar" was on the list, you would not be allowed to say foobar, f00bar, f**bar, foob@r, and so on. The software would catch only the first form automatically, so the moderators would have to clean up posts manually if the other forms were used, assuming the posts were noticed or reported. We would probably permit a one-letter version, e.g., f***** for foobar.

Sorry that I'm off-topic here, but it was a legitimate question deserving an answer.
I see, thanks. But this editing seems to be very regional (American?) The word 'bo**ocks' I wrote above (to prove a point) is very unacceptable in the UK.
FFS,

Sorry I couldn't resist. :p

This is about the time where someone comes into the thread and posts a link to that very naughtily named city in Deutchland.
Sorry, you'll have to spell it out. :eek:
 
As long as SilentPanda keeps his avatar the way it is :) I don't care whether or not any others are animated.

Gotta say I love the rolling panda avatar.

Every time an animated tar thread comes up I feel bad for having one because I don't really care about my tar that much. But then the community demands it stays! Sorry anti-animated tar community!

PS Just saw 'Edited for language'. Sorry, I could have sworn I put asterisks in. But how come the word 'bollocks' is freely acceptable in numerous posts but not s**t?

Because bollocks is a fake swear word made up by the British so they can be different. :p
 
But then the community demands it stays! Sorry anti-animated tar community!

Yours is one of the few I like. It's award-winning, remember? And probably because it's not too colourful and is less distracting. Or that it's very cute. :)
 
The iBlue 'tars™

Oh yes, the stir that was this cheeky little avatar:
thetar.gif
and its more innocent follower:
HornPlayer.gif


The cheekier one got reported ( :rolleyes: ) but the previous just ran its course and I took it down. I've had a couple others that seemed to turn heads but as always "for all the right reasons". What can I say? I like my saucy avatars sometimes.

unzipperSM1.gif


:D


My favourite is the complaint about being busted for fooling around at work because of these avatars. Poor little avatar scapegoats... hardly the real problem, eh?
 
Surprisingly, I've never heard of that place. Sure made my evening :D


I saw a similar photo somewhere in the Town that had a pictogram of children and under the pictogram on the same pole was the name of the City.

I was going to post a warning for the link but I realised that you'd have to fill in the missing bit anyway. Imagine someone complaining they went to the link and were offended. Reminds me of the joke about the old lady who complained to the police about the man who regularly bathed naked in the opposite flat. When the police arrive they said it was too far to see. "you'll need these binoculars" boom boom
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.