L
Lau
Guest
rtharper said:I can't speak for the other men that are not competely heterosexual, but being dubbed a "high risk group" is slightly offensive, given that the promiscuity of someone isn't a function of their sexuality...
I think she probably meant high-risk as in that's how it's worded in the forms you fill in when you give blood. I for one think it's completely bloody ridiculous that they do this, (and I know a lot of other people do too). I really don't get how a gay man who has monogamous safe sex with his partner is a higher risk than some random straight girl or guy who's been getting it on all over town without a condom. I thought it was ridiculous when I first went to give blood as a fresh-faced 18 year old, and I still think it is now.
Edit: Just realised I wrote a freakishly identical post on the first page of this thread a few months ago. Spooky (or I'm horribly predictable).