Funnily enough, Intel's stock price has gone up since the M1 was released, but Apple's has hardly budged.Intel has left the chat, the building and its heading to a cabin in the woods...
Funnily enough, Intel's stock price has gone up since the M1 was released, but Apple's has hardly budged.Intel has left the chat, the building and its heading to a cabin in the woods...
Read the post just before yours.And this is news . . . how, exactly?
Rather a "Duh!"
I’m hoping for the half price mac pro🤣Really hope the half size Mac Pro is real.
Great! I just hope that with the first gen Mac Pro with Apple Silicon, Apple does dual Apple Silicon + Intel.
This will happen sooner rather than later. The fastest way to get applications ported to Apple Silicon is to eliminate “transition devices” like the one you have suggested.Sounds crazy, I know. But a lot of us pros are still relying on native x86 to get our professional work done. I understand that the transition should eventually result in a Mac Pro with only Apple Silicon, but I think for the first gen version, it should have dual CPUs.
True dat! And many music softwares are still not able to work on MAC OS Catalina say nothing of Big Sur.Whoa, go easy on the ellipses.
Pros need the tools to be available though, in my case a lot of the tools that are use are limited to Windows and will never be ported to Mac - of any flavour. therefore I fully rely on being able to run Win10 in a VM and with the M1 chip that is currently not possible. hence I cannot stay with Apple - which I prefer for the rest of my workflow.
Yeah but its a hell of a chip. It may be a while before we get a better deal in a mac.I think I'll wait for the M-16.
Seriously though, if there ever was an argument for not buying a new Mac Mini, this is it.
They basically just told us that the M1 is a Beta chip.
Sell the iMac an buy the $699 miniGreat news overall, bummer news for me - I have to buy a new computer in 2020 to replace my 2015 27" iMac.
Do I get the last Intel iMac?
Or the new shiny M1 Mac Mini + Big Monitor?
Both are an improvement, but which will let me stick with my 5-year upgrade plan?
TomorrowCan we please just get a “Big Air”? You know, a 15” or 16” display with very narrow bezels (like the XPS15), an M1 chip or greater, 16 GB RAM and a 1TB SSD in a minimal body? THAT would tickly my “buy bone”...
The 2020 Intel MBA would have been able to run fanless too if Apple had implemented the same high quality heatsink and heat spreader like they did with the M1, instead of deliberately gimping it so that the cooling does almost nothing.Considering the current design is able to run fanless, I would say they have headroom for increasing cores... a lot more headroom than the competition anyways...
Duh - OF COURSE they're working on chips for the MP, iMac, and MBP.Read the post just before yours.
They’ve already beaten Intel, they’re doing 16 cores to beat themselves and provide a more significant delta front the current 8 core machines.
It will be interesting for sure to see which way Apple goes but they usually play the long game soSounds great, but am I the only one here who thinks that needing that many cores to surpass current performance is a bit worrying for the future? The current Macbook Pro 16" has eight cores, right? They're doing a 16-core to beat Intel? I suppose it doesn't matter how you get that higher performance as long as you get there, but I don't know, this doesn't seem like a scalable architecture.
Calling it now, the new "smaller" Mac Pro is gonna be the return of the cube. It was always Steve's wet dream to make a computer that's a silent cube, and now Apple Silicon makes it possible to make one that won't fry itself to death.
Ha ha its going to be half off too!!I’m hoping for the half price mac pro🤣
Funnily enough, Intel's stock price has gone up since the M1 was released, but Apple's has hardly budged.
Apple moves first and influences the market. My hunch is that x86 is finished soon.And of course, predictabl, AMD announced plans to introduce it’s own ARM CPU.