Against Intel's chips that haven't progressed in 8 years, going ARM makes sense. However, AMD's new chips are also leaving Intel behind without needing to rewrite all your x86 software.
Last edited:
Bootcamp will still be there with the Windows on ARM version. As for Citrix, I am using it on my iPad and my MacBook Pro. No difference besides the touch screen on iPad.Stupid question - will these MacBooks be able to bootcamp Windows, or to run software like Citrix to remote login to Windows machines?
They both require a full redesign of the motherboard. One of the reasons Apple is switching is that Apple wants the ability to upgrade when and how they see fit. Moving to AMD just means moving from Intel timeline to AMD timeline. They’re not getting the control they need.Against Intel's chips that haven't progressed in 8 years, going ARM makes sense. However, AMD's new chips are also leaving Intel behind with needing to rewrite all your x86 software.
I couldn’t care less, BUT the real question is Not arm or ... but what happens to the os and will there be a touch screen. What will be the difference to the now, late but ... iPadOS.
i mean Apple tested the usage of iPad apps on Mac, what’s going on there?
for me all these ‚leaks‘ are on purpose to hide the REAL changes and aspects of all that still stand over years now.
a new transparency paradigm wouldbe good for Apple and all the devs and customers. The old jobs hide away thing was cool yesteryears!
This is going to be the death of the Mac computers as a whole. Arm Macs won’t have any compatability with any of the software available until the software developers update their software and most will be left behind. Microsoft tried to transition to ARM with the Surface Pro X and Windows 10 on ARM has been a failure. I expect this to fail as well, especially since ARM will probably not have the same performance for all tasks compared to X86-64.
If they want software developers to jump on board they'll probably have to do better than that and release at least a more "pro" model or desktop as well.A new passively cooled 12 or 11" could make sense to serve as a testbed for performance of MacOS on ARM.
How does this relate to Joe Prosser rumour of a MacBook 12” with ARM launching at WWDC?
In line with a timeframe shared by analyst Ming-Chi Kuo last month, Bloomberg today reports that Apple is planning to release at least one Mac with its own custom-designed ARM-based processor by 2021.
![]()
The report claims that Apple is developing three Mac processors based on the A14 chip in upcoming iPhone 12 models. At least one of these processors will apparently be much faster than the A-series chips in the iPhone and iPad. Like the A14 chip, the Mac processors are expected to be manufactured by TSMC based on its 5nm process.
Apple's first Mac processors will have 12 cores, including eight high-performance cores and at least four energy-efficient cores, according to the report. Apple is said to be exploring Mac processors with more than 12 cores for further in the future, with the company already designing a second generation of Mac processors based on the A15 chip.
The first ARM-based Mac is likely to be a notebook, but analyst Ming-Chi Kuo expects at least one Mac desktop with an Apple processor next year too.
Article Link: Bloomberg: Apple's First ARM Mac to Launch by 2021 With 12-Core Processor
Not Apple is doomed, the Mac is.if we could only count all the times “Apple is doomed” has been predicted because of a change in processor architecture… 😅
Not Apple is doomed, the Mac is.
Apple will probably get by with the iDevices and Services, which makes them the majority of their profits nowadays anyway.
What makes you so strongly linked to Intel?I have already ported to using programs that are cross-platform.
So if Apple insists on abandoning x86 on the desktop, I will simply move to the other platforms.
The next version doesn't require licensing from Intel.Has anyone seen Thunderbolt work in an ARM system before?
The next version doesn't require licensing from Intel.