I'm in the same boat, with my 2012 rMBP. The SD slot is a feature I use all the time. Now that my kids have started in to photography it's a pain the ass on their much newer machines to download photos. A 16-inch MBP with an M-series chip that has an integrated SD slot would have me upgrade in a heartbeat.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Bloomberg: Next MacBook Pro to Feature SD Card Reader
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I don’t carry or need an adapter, I’d have no problem carrying one, and if someone really needs to haul around a bunch of peripheral gear and a hub to connect them simultaneously, fine. Those are probably field professionals and carrying a bunch of stuff around is a way of life.
Not to mention that leaving the wireless on in your camera drains the battery. I don't know anyone who actually uses it.
A professional is someone who earns money using the said technology.
SD cards are used by professionals and professionals use MacBook Pros.
Your argument might have merit but for the fact that apple dropped usb-a 5 years ago, and we’re still stuck with it.
As someone who creates content Nikon legit only had 2% of the camera market share. Canon has 50% most of their cameras still use SD cards. The m50 their most popular camera uses SD cards. Their brand new r5 that came out 2020 still has a SD slot. Sony had 20% share and guess what SD cards galore. The fx6 just released 2020 has a SD slot. This isn't some legacy thing lol. My eos r uses a SD slot. Came out in 2018.
I find it interesting that so many people are complaining about a port on a pro PORTABLE device. I don't like dongles. SD cards are not going anywhere anytime soon. Brand new $5000 cameras still use them. A vaaaast majority of cameras still use them among a lot of other devices. Including harms nothing just don't use it. I don't see what the big deal is. The fact that multiple people here are saying they were holding off just because of that kinda proves that point. Apple wants our money
Apple doesn’t care about “Pros”. It’s a neat little add on that just means it’s the upgraded model. It’s not for Professionals.
Take an external hard drive, for instance. You have to carry around the hard drive itself... and its cable anyway.
Are you telling me it's inconvenient to carry around a tiny USB-C dongle too?
Sure... it's three things instead of two... but presumably you carry everything in some sort of bag... including the laptop and its charger.
Or you can get a different cable that attaches the hard drive directly to USB-C. Therefore you're carrying the same amount of items since you need a cable anyway.
I dunno... it difficult to understand the "inconvenience" of carrying a dongle when you're carrying multiple items already.
You mean that I may connect two 5K displays to my MBP M1, one for each TB port? (when 5K displays with DP1.4 become available)
(a) the whole discussion is a sketchy rumour, about "adding ports", with zero mention of "retaining" the current port configuration.
(b) multiple people in the various threads about this topic, have said, that they want to "swap" some USB-C ports, for USB-A ports.
Literally never said anything about how many displays it will support. What I said, is that the Mini's for the last 2 1/2 years, including the one with M1, dedicate one of their graphics outputs to HDMI, making it unusable for non-HDMI displays.
How many TB3 SSDs do you know of that support daisy chaining? And, I'd like to think you're knowledgable enough to realise that this is defeating the purpose of using TB3 - a good SSD can saturate TB3 on it's own.
Yeah I found one, and discussed it. It needs AC power, and weighs nearly a kilogram. And still, sharing bandwidth. Kind of defeats the purpose of "high speed I/O" if you're just gonna use a hub.
Please try reading the threads then, because people are saying they want USB-A in place of USB-C.
One hub costs $29, is bus powered and weighs ~70 grams.Yes it’s hypocritical for you to tell others to just use a hub if it’s clearly a bother for you to do so.
The other costs $150, needs A/C power and weights 750 grams with the AC adapter.
You could by four of those USB-C hubs, to have all the HDMI and card readers and USB-A ports you want, hanging off four independent ports (and thus not crippling their speed) for less than it would cost to buy that one USB4 hub, which would then have to share the upstream bandwidth for speed.
It doesn't matter whether Apple "cares" about pros or not. The fact remains that the inclusion of an SD card slot would be beneficial to some, not to others. Either way, it's inclusion isn't detrimental to the performance of the device, so I'm not sure where you're going this with this.
Also, what's your source for claiming that an SD card isn't for professionals?
Just like...
Ditching the Butterfly keyboard and returning to a scissor variant?
Returning to modularity and a tower design for the Mac Pro?
The return of the MagSafe concept, only for iOS?
Making the 16" MBP thicker again rather than thinner?
Bringing back the boot chime for macOS?
Indeed.
Ok, then sounds like the guy several replies up was just trying to shill something about CFExpress superiority. I also know that in the consumer area, which is basically "prosumer" now since phones took away most of the market, it's unheard of not to use an SD card.
I’m happy about this coming back, sure some of you iphone photographers will scoff at this, but many of us wield some impressive cameras and getting rid of the dongle for us will be helpful.
Professionals used to use CF cards. We now use CFExpress. SD was for consumer cameras.
Like CF, SD is still included - and used - on an overwhelming majority of digital cameras.
Pro photographers use CFExpress. Look at the Nikon D6 and Canon 1DxIII, both are dual CFExpress. Even the middle models are CFEXpress with a SD slot that cripples the cameras performance in exchange for something resembling a backup (though I wouldn’t consider SD a backup).
Aha once again a justification for why others should adapt and live with the trade-offs instead of you.
Last edited:
From an audio perspective this would be amazing. Portable field recorders still use SD almost exclusively.