Bluetooth vs. Nike+, FIGHT!!!

Discussion in 'iPod touch' started by pismodude2, Sep 10, 2008.

  1. pismodude2 macrumors 6502a

    pismodude2

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Location:
    MacWorld
    #1
    Which do you think should have been added to the Touch, Bluetooth support or the Nike chip?

    I'll try to be as unbiased as possible: BLUETOOTH!!!:D

    The adapters for Bluetooth are bigger than the Touch itself now! :mad:
     
  2. Sief9 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2008
    #2
    I never heard of Nike+, so I'd have to go for Bluetooth.
     
  3. 4DThinker macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    #3
    The ironic thing is that they (ifixit.com) found a broadcom wifi/bluetooth/FM capable chip in the new Touch, and the only thing Apple seems to be using it for is wifi and possibly to connect the the NIKE shoe transmitter via some corruption/hack/custom signal from that chip. My guess is that Stevie himself is a jogger and Nike Show wearer, so NIKE was his choice.

    For me? I'd have bought the new Touch (even though I have an original one) if it had bluetooth. As it is, I'll stick with my Samsung P2 for wireless music enjoyment, and my Touch for email, weather, and web browsing.
     

Share This Page