Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Book Excerpt Explores Apple's 'Soul Sucking' Information Systems & Technology Team

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,401
40,444


Apple has a team called Information Systems & Technology (IS&T), that builds its internal technology tools, including servers and data infrastructure. The IS&T group, according to an excerpt from an upcoming book shared by BuzzFeed News "operates in a state of tumult."

alwaysdayone.jpg

Made up largely of contractors hired by rival consulting companies, Apple's IS&T team has been likened to a "Game of Thrones nightmare" with turmoil, infighting, and disagreements that hinder work.
"There's a Cold War going on every single day," Archana Sabapathy, a former IS&T contractor who did two stints in the division, told me. Sabapathy's first stint at IS&T lasted more than three years, the second only a day. Inside the division, she said, contracting companies such as Wipro, Infosys, and Accenture are constantly fighting to fill roles and win projects, which are handed out largely on the basis of how cheaply they can staff up to Apple's needs.
Click to expand...
Companies involved in providing contractors for available roles don't care about the work, the talent, or the effort that's put in. People come and go with no notice, and Apple employees have been forced to rewrite code created by IS&T on multiple occasions.

Experiences shared on Quora have said that working on the IS&T team is "worse than sweatshops in India" and a "soul sucking" place to be.

Apple also has unrealistic expectations for the IS&T team, paying consulting companies as much as $150 an hour while contractors make much less, up to $55 per hour, leaving Apple with "lesser contractors" to fill the "same high demands."

The excerpt suggests that Apple should make an effort to fix its "broken" IS&T division as it would be the right thing to do from a moral standpoint and could also help Apple's business.

The full excerpt can be read over on BuzzFeed's website, and it comes from the book "Always Day One" by BuzzFeed writer Alex Kantrowitz. "Always Day One" takes a look at the inner workings of Amazon, Facebook, Google, Apple, and Microsoft.

Article Link: Book Excerpt Explores Apple's 'Soul Sucking' Information Systems & Technology Team
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2020/04/07/book-excerpt-apple-information-systems-team/
Not good. This should all be done internally. Hire the best, do it right

This is how Boeing ****ed up. By relying too much on contractors. Hopefully Apple will course correct
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U, dave559, jpn and 10 others
I wouldn't be surprised if the contracts are made and/or negotiated by that guy that was interviewed a while back. The cheapskate dude. Forgot his name. Heard he was a monster, lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: adib
Wow! This sounds exactly like defense contracting. I mean, it REALLY does sound like it. I bet they make employees sign "at-will" clauses as part of the hiring process, too. I remember starting work at one USMC base in 29 Palms, California, and they had no job-related documentation for new hires. No desktop procedures, no turnover documentation, and the SOP (standard operating procedures) had been in perpetual draft the entire time I was there (and it wasn't worked on, not once). These are requirements that the USMC has marines follow, but once you're a civilian, the shackles come off, and complacency sets in. The only onboarding I received was company-related and involved benefits, direct deposit, etc. As long as the minimum requirements are being met, no one asks any questions. Pretty embarrassing, really.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: adib, Darth Tulhu, jpn and 5 others
Not unique to Apple. Microsoft uses legions of contract workers to handle a lot of core tasks while the FTEs mostly just managed them or did reporting. MS CEO Nadella started a review a couple of years back and started pulling some of "the Crown Jewels" and core IP back into FTE hands, but MS still has plenty of contractors doing critical corporate tasks at fairly lower wages and benefits than the FTEs that oversee them.

I expect it is similar at Google, Facebook and other large IT corporations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: V_Man, Silencio, CarpalMac and 9 others
I've pointed out on this forum before how few employees has relative to its size. Compare it to the number of employees IBM has for example (about three times as many).

I was a contractor for Apple a couple of times, but I had no idea their internal tools were built by contractors as well.

Apple should be investing in itself. To strive for something better than great profit margins.

The more you take a step back and get a birds eye view, the more Apple looks like an organization whose greatest success is organizing various contractors around the world in a way to produce a lot of revenue that benefits a relatively small number of employees, with the ones at the top receiving the lion's share in stock options. Yes, they have good products (although that's been murkier as time has gone on), but it seems like having good products has been secondary for a while to their success and strategy. They care about products, but obviously not enough or it hasn't scaled well as they've grown.

Tim Cook is very good at what he does. I just don't like what he does. Or what he does shouldn't be the aim of Apple. It should be secondary, in an ideal world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitch, 4487549, jaster2 and 15 others
This is the same for every single company out there.. There are RFPs and every single vendor goes trough blood bath to get the contract.. Its no different after the contract is signed..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Breaking Good and Dwalls90
sadly, replace "apple" with most other big corp, banks, ...

does trump have the *alls to tariff off-shore and on-shore cheep-cheep IT labor, which has been destroying American programmers for decades ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TTTedP and Dwalls90
Well, I had to deal with IS&T all the time when I worked there. To be fair, the job is chaotic by design. They have to interface with a bunch of 3rd party companies with constantly changing policies and procedures. They also had to support every retail store. Soooo... it was chaotic, but it really had to be
 
  • Like
Reactions: name99
swingerofbirch said:
I've pointed out on this forum before how few employees has relative to its size. Compare it to the number of employees IBM has for example (about three times as many).
Click to expand...

Isn't a large part of IBM's business also consulting now though? Dissimilar to Apple in retail, in consulting, employees are generating your service. Therefore it would make more sense that IBM's headcount would be higher.

swingerofbirch said:
The more you take a step back and get a birds eye view, the more Apple looks like an organization whose greatest success is organizing various contractors around the world in a way to produce a lot of revenue that benefits a relatively small number of employees, with the ones at the top receiving the lion's share in stock options. Yes, they have good products (although that's been murkier as time has gone on), but it seems like having good products has been secondary for a while to their success and strategy. They care about products, but obviously not enough or it hasn't scaled well as they've grown.
Click to expand...

I'm not discounting Apple's areas of improvements, but this seems to be the case for any large company. Rarely do the ideas come from the C-suite, but that doesn't stop them from getting paid a multiplier of 100 compared to middle management.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CreatorCode
How is this Apple (or big tech) specific? This is literally the state of affairs for any company that uses these garbage contracting firms.

Citation: Personal experience having to work with these garbage contracting firms and their idiot employees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dwalls90 and TheDemogordon
As someone who worked closely with IS&T for 7 years and then as part of them for 2 years, I can tell you that what is written is almost entirely true. It was that way in 2003 and I'm sure it's not going to be changing anytime soon in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adib and jpn
69Mustang said:
Relativity. Relative to the pay for a cashier at a grocery store, the $55/hr is fairly high. Relative to corporate contemporaries, the pay is fairly low.
Click to expand...

Not saying the pay is acceptable, but one thing to keep in mind is that the majority of these contractors are working in India.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpn
swingerofbirch said:
The more you take a step back and get a birds eye view, the more Apple looks like an organization whose greatest success is organizing various contractors around the world in a way to produce a lot of revenue that benefits a relatively small number of employees, with the ones at the top receiving the lion's share in stock options.
Click to expand...

Jacques Attali was right. CEOs and presidents of corporations are the feudal overlords of the next millenium.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silencio and TTTedP
"...working on the IS&T team is "worse than sweatshops in India.""

"contractors make much less, up to $55 per hour"

Not trying to downplay the toxic workplace environment this excerpt describes but worse than sweatshops in India? Really? Can we perhaps get our realities in check and avoid the unnecessary hyperbole?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alfredo_Delgado, CarpalMac, gixxerfool and 2 others
Heelpir8 said:
Yeah. I’m not sure what the problem is here. But I’m also not in the industry.
Click to expand...
You don't have to be in the industry. Anyone working in any job should be able to see the difference between people who take pride in their work and people who are just there to collect a paycheck. It's possible that many of them started the job with the best of intentions, but the circumstances made it difficult for them to do the best possible work so they just stopped caring. I'm sure that many of us have been in that kind of situation. Do you stick it out just because the money is good? Or do you leave and find another job because you don't see the situation improving, and the stress vs pay ratio was not worth it? In the case of Apple, they may also have to decide if the prestige factor makes up for the other issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colonel Blimp, Pitch, robertcoogan and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back