Soft bricked is more likely the correct term?
When someone buys a new hard drive, do they consider it "bricked" until they install their OS onto it? A computer cannot boot from a blank drive, so it must be bricked. Right?
What about a drive that already has Windows or Linux installed, but you delete some system files, preventing it from booting. Is your computer suddenly bricked?
Is it a "soft brick" because you can just pop your OS disc in and re-install?
It's the same with an iPhone. If it's not booting up, then maybe something with its configuration is messed up. You simply need to re-install it's OS.
It is NOTHING like a brick. It can't be a "soft" brick if it's nothing like a brick in the first place. It never got close to being a brick.
Here's an example of a brick:
You try to update a router. Mid-way through the firmware flash, your power flickers off for some unknown reason (maybe there is a storm nearby, or they were doing work on lines). The router cannot boot because it has no OS. You cannot reflash the firmware unless the device boots. There is no recovery mode. No DFU mode. No "just reinstall the OS". The device
cannot be used. It is as good as a
brick.
If you can simply connect an iPhone to iTunes and restore, it was never bricked. Not a hard brick, not a soft brick. It was like an empty hard drive that you just need to install an OS to.
It cheapens the word and insults those who have had to deal with a real, actual bricked device to call everything that doesn't boot a "brick".