Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

agrayphoto

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 17, 2008
24
1
Cleveland, USA
So when I was considering buying a new workstation I debated whether I needed 4 or 8 cores. I am a photographer and work mostly in Bridge and Photoshop. After following this forum for a while I decided on the 8 even though the consensus was I probably didn't need it for my work. Today I was processing some RAW files and happened to have the floating CPU monitor open in activity monitor. The graph for all 8 processors was dancing like crazy. So I ran it again with the CPU history window opened and made a screen capture with Grab.

The first is from making a web gallery from 44 RAW files. The second is processing jpegs from the same files. This indicates to me that Bridge is using all 8 processors. Am I wrong? Either way the machine is smoking fast and I am extremely happy with it.
 

Attachments

  • cpu history 0620.jpg
    cpu history 0620.jpg
    167 KB · Views: 112
  • cpu history 0620 2.jpg
    cpu history 0620 2.jpg
    188.3 KB · Views: 76
Don't let people steer you from getting more cores. Snow Leopard (what a name) is gonna push to optimize for multiple cores and just about every software company out there knows there is a future in multi-core processing.

Very sweet setup you got there i must admit
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.