After dealing with a very poor wireless internet range in my home, I have decided that the problem is the wireless range on the Siemens Gigaset se567 modem/router which was given to me by the ISP. I am heading out this evening to purchase an Apple Airport Extreme (AEBS).
My research has told me that I can configure the Siemens se567 to "Bridge Mode," disabling the wireless router feature so that it acts as a modem only. If this is true, I am hoping I will experience more reliable connectivity by hooking the AEBS to the Siemens, allowing the AEBS to act as the router instead.
Here is my question >>> I have also read of numerous instances whereby people have done the reverse setup. In other words, they use the Airport Extreme as the modem (in bridge mode) and the Siemens se567 as the router. I'm just curious as to why anyone would do this? The Seimens has a notoriously bad reputation as a router with very poor wireless range. Conversely, the Airport Extreme supposedly has a very good wireless range (some say better than the Express) as well as the newer 802.11n technology (superior to the Siemens which is b/g). Therefore, using an expensive Airport Extreme as a bridge to a pretty crappy router would defeat the purpose of getting the AE, wouldn't it?
I'm surely missing something here. I was just wondering if anyone here might be able to shed a little light on the subject for me. I'm buying the Airport Extreme tonight in hopes that it will be a far superior router than the piece of junk I got from my ISP, so I'd kinda like to get this sorted out before I throw down $200.
Thanks in advance,
Allan
My research has told me that I can configure the Siemens se567 to "Bridge Mode," disabling the wireless router feature so that it acts as a modem only. If this is true, I am hoping I will experience more reliable connectivity by hooking the AEBS to the Siemens, allowing the AEBS to act as the router instead.
Here is my question >>> I have also read of numerous instances whereby people have done the reverse setup. In other words, they use the Airport Extreme as the modem (in bridge mode) and the Siemens se567 as the router. I'm just curious as to why anyone would do this? The Seimens has a notoriously bad reputation as a router with very poor wireless range. Conversely, the Airport Extreme supposedly has a very good wireless range (some say better than the Express) as well as the newer 802.11n technology (superior to the Siemens which is b/g). Therefore, using an expensive Airport Extreme as a bridge to a pretty crappy router would defeat the purpose of getting the AE, wouldn't it?
I'm surely missing something here. I was just wondering if anyone here might be able to shed a little light on the subject for me. I'm buying the Airport Extreme tonight in hopes that it will be a far superior router than the piece of junk I got from my ISP, so I'd kinda like to get this sorted out before I throw down $200.
Thanks in advance,
Allan