Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jdl8422

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 5, 2006
491
0
Louisiana
I am currently building a RAID setup for storage of iTunes and other files. I have 4 hard drive spots to work with. I have been throwing around a few options. Any suggestions on the safest way of doing this would be great!

Option 1:
4 x 1.5TB (2x1.5TB RAID 0 + 2x1.5TB RAID 0 Clone) What would be the worst case scenario with this? if one hard drive fails I would just use the clone or vice versa.

Option 2:
4 x 1.5TB RAID 1 with no clone. Which of these is the better option? or is there an option 3?
 
Since you can't do RAID 5 without a card the RAID 10 (option 1) setup is likely
your best bet.

http://support.apple.com/kb/TA24359

No matter what you still only end up with 3TB.

I agree, RAID 0+1 seems to be the best option. If OP did RAID 1, he would end up with 1.5TB I think because the data is mirrored to all drives

If you could do RAID 5 you would end up with roughly 4190TB

I didn't know RAID 5 can increase the total capacity by that much :rolleyes: 4.19PB sounds massive :D
 
I am using a G4 Quicksilver and I have 2 sonnet tempo SATA cards. Each card has 2 SATA ports. I'm not really sure if I can do a RAID 0+1. Sounds like a good idea if I can. Would just setting up two RAID 0 and using carbon copy to clone one RAID 0 to other work just as well?
 
I am using a G4 Quicksilver and I have 2 sonnet tempo SATA cards. Each card has 2 SATA ports. I'm not really sure if I can do a RAID 0+1. Sounds like a good idea if I can. Would just setting up two RAID 0 and using carbon copy to clone one RAID 0 to other work just as well?

Of course it would, it's just software "RAID 1" but does the same thing
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.