I don't think anything spectacular is going to come this year, and the 16" is now on the refurb.
So, you can sweeten things by saving few hundred dollars now and feel better when a minor upgrade shows up in few months
Is it reliable to buy it refurbished? I plan to keep it for many years and it is no joke to spend nearly 3000€ on thatI don't think anything spectacular is going to come this year, and the 16" is now on the refurb.
So, you can sweeten things by saving few hundred dollars now and feel better when a minor upgrade shows up in few months
Is it reliable to buy it refurbished? I plan to keep it for many years and it is no joke to spend nearly 3000€ on that
I bought a refurbished late 2008 MBP the day after the 2009 models were announced and got $650 off the normal price. It still runs today, although the battery only has about a 10 minute charge now.Is it reliable to buy it refurbished? I plan to keep it for many years and it is no joke to spend nearly 3000€ on that
I sold the 2018 to upgrade but I'm wondering if I should buy a 16" now, or if there is something spectacular coming no more than 4 months away.
Yes I DO need the 16" MBP soon, and it does have to be the 16".
Thanks
Increasing the ram speed from 2666MHz to 3733MHz isn't that much of a difference?
But the new 13" MBP has LPDDR4xComet Lake H supports DDR4-2933 max. It doesn’t support LPDDR4x
But the new 13" MBP has LPDDR4x
My take is that modern CPUs are so fast that for the majority of users really won't care if its 4 cores, 6 cores or 8. While pokey (and only used by my daughter), my 2012 rMBP is capable of running much of the software without too much issue. If an 8 year old computer is still relevant, I'd say the debate of performance between the 13" and 16" is not as important as many people make it out to be.But the new 13" MBP has LPDDR4x
There was actually a study done that stated that refurbished goods had a lower failure rate than brand new goods.
Other than that, it comes with the same warranty and opportunity to extend it. I've had 3 refurbished macbooks in the last 5 years, and it was the 2 macbook that I bought new, that were faulty.
My take is that modern CPUs are so fast that for the majority of users really won't care if its 4 cores, 6 cores or 8. While pokey (and only used by my daughter), my 2012 rMBP is capable of running much of the software without too much issue. If an 8 year old computer is still relevant, I'd say the debate of performance between the 13" and 16" is not as important as many people make it out to be.