Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ChaosAngel

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 29, 2005
91
15
UK
So I am on the verge of buying a new MacBook Pro.

My question is should I wait for Arrandale? I have being about the new chip and it looks like it could be very interesting.

From what I have read it looks like Arrandale will have a combined 32nm CPU, but also an on-package GPU that will still be manufactured using Intel’s 45nm process.

The on-package GPU could be very interesting, however considering Apple recently made the shift to use the nVidia chipset/GPU where would this new chip from Intel fit in the Apple lineup? Is it possible to get an Arrandale chip without the integrated GPU? From what I read it does not look likely as Intel have actually moved the memory controller of the CPU to the GPU and therefore to remove the GPU from the package would require a significant redesign and a change to the manufacturing process. (Does not seem cost effective for them).

If Apple decides to use the new Intel chip then that might mean they are also forced to use the on-package GPU (based on Intel's history of GPU's that worries me). I assume a dedicated solution from nVidia can still be used, however that does not seem like an efficient use of silicon.

Finally it looks like we might finally see Arrandale in the test labs in Q4/09, but not available at retail until Q1/10. Thats still over six months away and therefore pushes me towards making a purchase now.

I would love to hear other people thoughts? Also feel free to correct me if any of the information above is incorrect :)
 
Buy now. They were just updated so we might not see anything for quite some time. Also keep in mind that Intel's release doesn't guarantee that Apple will release it in its machines at the same time.
 
I wouldnt bother waiting for chips. Its rare to see any difference between them. Larger gaps is where you see the difference.
 
Why wait? For a small, very unnoticeable speed bump?

well, to be fair, the arrandale release is the laptop version of nehalem (i7) which provides a much more efficient bang for your clock cycle buck. so it is true there will only be small 'bump' in clock speed, the real world application will provide significant performance boost.
 
I agree with everyone else. It's not worth the long wait for that small of a speed bump. Get a macbook now. A few years down the road you can get another one with a very noticeable speed bump. :)

PS I just got the new macbook. Amazing. :apple:
 
I agree with everyone else. It's not worth the long wait for that small of a speed bump. Get a macbook now. A few years down the road you can get another one with a very noticeable speed bump. :)

PS I just got the new macbook. Amazing. :apple:

True. If you keep waiting for the next update you'll never own anything. Most people update their laptops every 2-3 years and the current MBP will still be decent for that time frame.
 
well, to be fair, the arrandale release is the laptop version of nehalem (i7) which provides a much more efficient bang for your clock cycle buck. so it is true there will only be small 'bump' in clock speed, the real world application will provide significant performance boost.

I know that. ;) But my point is that no one needs that speed bump. The current dual cores are already way too much power for most. If someone really needs that speed, we'd already have it by now. If you're waiting for the latest, you'll almost never buy, but if you're waiting for more power because you need it, then keep waiting.
 
True. If you keep waiting for the next update you'll never own anything. Most people update their laptops every 2-3 years and the current MBP will still be decent for that time frame.

True, but if I have learned anything from Apple, it always pays to wait about 6-9 months after a new model (notebook) release to get a significantly cheaper/better computer for my buck.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.