Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New Mac Pro? What new Mac Pro?

We asked for a new one not a warmed over stay of execution one.
The recommend should be don't buy till they sort it properly. :mad:
Will be rocking a 2008 Octo for a few more years yet I think.
 
no, a $3,499 Mac Pro that used $400 2.4GHz 4-core processors is now using $551 2.4GHz 6-core processors and costs $300 more.

Maybe he is talking about the 2.93GHz 12 core which was previously over $7k with 6GB RAM. It's now 3GHz with 12GB RAM and in the $6k range.
 
Nonsense!

Absolutely disagree with the OP. Today's update answered the call from consumers who lobbied hard for the continuation of the Mac Pros. These updates are very worthy enhancements that make these the fastest and most powerful Mac Pros ever. We all have a duty to support Apple and not urge potential buyers to avoid buying these products. Its selfish to do so if its just because they are not as fast as you expected.

I initially thought this was a spoof - but now I'm not so sure.

The bottom line is that the updates made are nowhere near enough to satisfy those of us who have patiently (and not so patiently) waited for major improvements to the Mac Pro.

Unfortunately, the OP is absolutely right.
 
Absolutely disagree with the OP. Today's update answered the call from consumers who lobbied hard for the continuation of the Mac Pros. These updates are very worthy enhancements that make these the fastest and most powerful Mac Pros ever. We all have a duty to support Apple and not urge potential buyers to avoid buying these products. Its selfish to do so if its just because they are not as fast as you expected.

WOW. I want some of what he's smoking! ^

AGREE. Change the buy recommendation to DO NOT BUY !!

It's nothing more than reconfigured OLD TECH, not to mention a HUGE middle finger from Apple.
 
Completely agreed. Without further explanation from apple, this is not a refresh, is an insult.

The three year's old gpu is low even by apple recent standards.
 
Absolutely disagree with the OP. Today's update answered the call from consumers who lobbied hard for the continuation of the Mac Pros. These updates are very worthy enhancements that make these the fastest and most powerful Mac Pros ever. We all have a duty to support Apple and not urge potential buyers to avoid buying these products. Its selfish to do so if its just because they are not as fast as you expected.

It's not about the speed. I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone that needs more raw CPU speed, who thinks that s/he can get it from a simple desktop style box.

It's everything else that makes it a non-buy. Where's the thunderbolt? Where's the USB 3.0, which was out over a year ago? Where's the video card - what they give you now is on par with the intel 4000?

If all you care about is speed, get an iMac, or a PC to use as a rendering machine. If you want a mac pro, with the latest pro features, this isn't it. It wasn't updated, it got a speed bumb, but it's still woefully outdated.
 
Agreed.

I hate itoys with every fiber of my being for causing all of this.

I would not have agreed with you until today.
I figured the money Apple makes with their toys and gadgets would help keep the Mac Pro line alive.
I was wrong.
 
WOW. I want some of what he's smoking! ^

AGREE. Change the buy recommendation to DO NOT BUY !!

It's nothing more than reconfigured OLD TECH, not to mention a HUGE middle finger from Apple.

Too right it's a middle finger. A middle finger slipping into the sphincter of the pro market, swiftly followed by the rest of the arm.
 
It will be interesting to see if macrumors is in the pocket of apple. If they dont change the recommendation then I will assume they are in collusion with apple for certain kicks and it will bring the integrity of the site into question for me.
Yup, that's the most logical assumption.

It's not that we say Buy Now in the Buyer's Guide whenever there is an update, no matter how minor, in the assumption that another update won't be coming for a while -- see the iPod Touch last fall -- it's that Apple is buying us off.
 
Yup, that's the most logical assumption.

It's not that we say Buy Now in the Buyer's Guide whenever there is an update, no matter how minor, in the assumption that another update won't be coming for a while -- see the iPod Touch last fall -- it's that Apple is buying us off.

I'm curious as to why MacRumors would recomend buying a Mac Pro today, when yesterday MR said not to. Besides a mediocre speed bump, the underlying hardware hasn't been updated since 2010, and is lacking basic features like USB 3.0, and the video card is next to pointless - the Intel 4000 found in the Macbook Air is faster.
 
I'm curious as to why MacRumors would recomend buying a Mac Pro today, when yesterday MR said not to. Besides a mediocre speed bump, the underlying hardware hasn't been updated since 2010, and is lacking basic features like USB 3.0, and the video card is next to pointless - the Intel 4000 found in the Macbook Air is faster.
The only thing the Buyer's Guide takes into account is anticipated upgrades and refreshes.

Yesterday, the Mac Pro had gone quite a while without an update of any kind. Today it was updated and it is therefore a good time to buy if you are in the market for one. It doesn't say anything about if it's a good value or not -- that's up to the individual consumer. Some folks would say the new Retina MacBook Pro is a terrible value when you can get an iPad and 13" MacBook Air for the same money.

Do you expect another update for the Mac Pro in the next few months?
 
I'll admit I didn't start using Apple products until early 2009 when I bought my first iPhone. I've never claimed to be the number one loyalist who has been blindly buying Apple products even in the bad old days. But I think their stuff is great now and that's why I use it and recommend the products to people.

Do you use a Mac Pro? Apparently not.

I tend to stick to recommending products I know something about to people who need to use them. You clearly have no idea what constitutes professional level hardware because this Mac doesn't use anything in that category from the last two years.
 
Yup, that's the most logical assumption.

It's not that we say Buy Now in the Buyer's Guide whenever there is an update, no matter how minor, in the assumption that another update won't be coming for a while -- see the iPod Touch last fall -- it's that Apple is buying us off.

I guess I misunderstood the purpose of that portion of the site. Maybe you should change the name from "buyers guide" to "updates" or something else that doesnt lead me to think its a buyers guide.
 
I'm curious as to why MacRumors would recomend buying a Mac Pro today, when yesterday MR said not to. Besides a mediocre speed bump, the underlying hardware hasn't been updated since 2010, and is lacking basic features like USB 3.0, and the video card is next to pointless - the Intel 4000 found in the Macbook Air is faster.

No it isn't. Go try and render a 3D scene on the Macbook air and see how quickly it finishes compared to the Mac Pro.
 
I am offended by the very idea MacRumors change their buying guidance because an update didn't meet the needs of a few people. The buyers guide is all about helping people determine when a new product refresh might be due. As Apple has just updated the Mac Pro line, there won't be any new Mac Pros for a long while, if at all. Therefore the guidance to Buy Now is absolutely correct.

With a small speed bump, you are going to turn the clock back to zero?
 
Last edited:
We have no duty to support Apple.

You're right, our duty is only in helping people get the best computer for them. For some, that will be a Mac Pro.

My advice to anyone technologically savvy enough to do it would be to build a Hackintosh. You can find information about that across the internet. This should be a decent springboard for those interested.
 
From the Buyer's Guide:
This page provides a product summary for each Apple model. The intent is to provide our best recommendations regarding current product cycles, and to provide a summary of currently available rumors for each model.

The Buyer's Guide predicts updates or product cycles, not value. Please don't confuse the two as they are very different. Product cycles can be predicted somewhat objectively. Value is completely subjective, even though many of us (all of us ;)) agree the current update's value is pretty low. MR does their best to keep the Buyer's Guide as objective as possible. It's merely a tool for a smart buyer to consider; not the Bible of when to purchase a new machine.

If you need a new Mac Pro, now is a good time to buy because it will be a while before a refresh hits. You might not like the value, but that doesn't change the fact that it won't be updated anytime soon (I wish I were wrong, but I doubt it).
 
Just thanking the moderator for taking the time to weigh into this thread, and making sure I understand what was said:

A product qualifies for a "buy now" recommendation once it's clear that there is no update coming any time soon, irrespective of how outdated the existing product is?

In which case, if Apple announced that the next Mac Pro would now not be released until 2021, would MacRumors still be showing a "Buy Now!" note on the 10 year old Mac Pro in 2019?

Your point about the objective nature of product life-cycle tracking is well taken, but "buy now" does sound very much like...well, a recommendation, just as updated "Zero" days ago also sounds like an update...

(Just how minor can an update be, and still reset your "Days since last update" counter? Same specs, new colour? 2GB of extra RAM? Free steak knives?)
 
Just thanking the moderator for taking the time to weigh into this thread, and making sure I understand what was said:
The moderators do not run the Buyer's Guide and we do not have any more insight than any other member. This is just my interruption of what the Buyer's Guide is.


The Buyer's Guide looks at the average time between past updates, regardless of the size of the update, and guesses if an update is in the near future. It ignores rumors and when people think it will actually be released. If it is close to or over the average (427 days for the Mac Pro as of now) then it says don't buy. If it is close to the beginning of a cycle (0 days of the 427 average as of right now) then it says don't buy. In between there are other status messages.

It's a simple tool. Don't read too much into it.
 
the buyers guide is useless if it "recommends" we buy the "new" mac pro. it is morally reprehensible of macrumors to trick users into buying this already outdated product.
 
the buyers guide is useless if it "recommends" we buy the "new" mac pro. it is morally reprehensible of macrumors to trick users into buying this already outdated product.

Trick the user into buying? Who is stupid enough to go buy a $2500 computer simply because a website says, and I quote,
Just Updated!
. Now, if the buyers guide actually had any logic applied to it other than simple math, I would agree, or was actually taking user input to decide if it was a good computer, then you have an excellent point. But, as this is only showing how long it has been since the product is update, it is a good time to buy, if one was looking for a new Mac Pro.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.