• Did you order new AirTags? We've opened a dedicated AirTags forum.

From Cape Town

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 6, 2012
2
0
Cape Town, South Africa
Don't just mean by display but also by processing, memory and HD sharing.

Something similar to running 2 Processors in a Mac Pro.

This will allow you to have 2 X 27' Cinema Displays with a lot of processing power & memory while controlling it all as a sigle unit. 1 keyboard, 1 mouse, 1 trackpad.
 

osiris24x

macrumors member
Mar 11, 2007
51
0
As far as I know, this isn't yet possible. It seems quite feasible that Apple may eventually integrate XGrid computing into Thunderbolt, however. For now, Thunderbolt is only used for storage and displays. The next iteration of Thunderbolt will have much higher bandwidth, so maybe then?
 
Comment

From Cape Town

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 6, 2012
2
0
Cape Town, South Africa
No other way of doing it?
Was thinking of rather getting an additional new iMac (when released) than getting just a Display that does not fit next to the current iMac. Seems that inclusions like USB3 will make a hell of a difference pertaining to external storage devices.
 
Comment

leman

macrumors G5
Oct 14, 2008
13,124
8,660
Don't just mean by display but also by processing, memory and HD sharing.

Something similar to running 2 Processors in a Mac Pro.

This will allow you to have 2 X 27' Cinema Displays with a lot of processing power & memory while controlling it all as a sigle unit. 1 keyboard, 1 mouse, 1 trackpad.

This is very difficult and won't be even remotely as useful as you think, that's why nobody bothers to implement this. Basically, what you suggest is to use TB as an interconnect bridge between two CPUs. While Thunderbolt is fast, it does not even approach the requirements for a task like that.

A more practical thing is to split heavy workloads between different computers (w.g. while computer A performs a half of a long task, the computer B performs the other half, and you combine them afterwards). This is what XGrid does.
 
Comment

old-wiz

macrumors G3
Mar 26, 2008
8,319
225
West Suburban Boston Ma
This is very difficult and won't be even remotely as useful as you think, that's why nobody bothers to implement this. Basically, what you suggest is to use TB as an interconnect bridge between two CPUs. While Thunderbolt is fast, it does not even approach the requirements for a task like that.

A more practical thing is to split heavy workloads between different computers (w.g. while computer A performs a half of a long task, the computer B performs the other half, and you combine them afterwards). This is what XGrid does.

Before I retired, I did some work in distributed computing, and while it can work wonders, it requires the right hardware and software and especially fast links between systems. The only time it makes sense is when you have really big needs.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.