Always the "I don't need a screen protector" person chiming in.
There's three sorts of folks who go without screen protectors: Those who succeed in never having any scratches, those who don't care about minor scratches, and those who regret their choice.
Unless you're willing to put up escrow for the OP to have his screen repaired, it's bad advice to tell someone they don't need one. You don't know their situation or how carefully they handle their phone.
False premise. Many people (including me) put screen protectors on their sport watches. Since I've always worn mine as daily watches and I have an active life, it's worked out well. I typically manage to bang the face into stuff enough that without the protector the screens would be f'd up.Why is it that people put glass screen protectors on their phones but not on their watches?
Different use cases, which is obvious to anyone with half a brain.Or why not on their vehicle's front windshield? Or what about on their HD TVS?
Lol it was much needed in the early days of the smartphone, not anymore.The screen protector industry is laughing all the way to the bank. "Paranoid iPhone Guy" is the reason why.
Why is it that people put glass screen protectors on their phones but not on their watches? Or why not on their vehicle's front windshield? Or what about on their HD TVS?
When did this screen protector hysteria begin??? Sigh.
The screen protector industry is laughing all the way to the bank. "Paranoid iPhone Guy" is the reason why.
Why is it that people put glass screen protectors on their phones but not on their watches? Or why not on their vehicle's front windshield? Or what about on their HD TVS?
When did this screen protector hysteria begin??? Sigh.
The screen protector industry is laughing all the way to the bank. "Paranoid iPhone Guy" is the reason why.
Why is it that people put glass screen protectors on their phones but not on their watches? Or why not on their vehicle's front windshield? Or what about on their HD TVS?
When did this screen protector hysteria begin??? Sigh.
I'd much rather pay a couple of pounds for a screen protector than go through the hassle and expense of replacing the screen and all it takes is one slip!
lol at screen protectors. No need for them, unless you work next to drills. Even apple recommends it.
Correct, you were Thread Crapping. Doesn't help anyone and just makes you look like a dick.I wasn't answering.
I'm not saying that you don't need a screen protector to protect from damage but just because your screen protector shattered from the impact doesn't mean the actual screen would have shattered without the protector.Phones are easy to drop from a height that can cause a lot of damage. Here's a good example of why a screen protector is a good idea:
This is my wife's phone 2 days after she got it - she dropped it and it landed screen first on a stone so even the Otterbox didn't protect it from that
View attachment 660849
Fortunately, she had a glass screen protector on it: This is what the protector looked like when we took it off
View attachment 660850
And this is the phone - completely undamaged
View attachment 660851
I'd much rather pay a couple of pounds for a screen protector than go through the hassle and expense of replacing the screen and all it takes is one slip!
Lmao that's a new one on the internet.Correct, you were Thread Crapping. Doesn't help anyone and just makes you look like a dick.
I'd rather have thinner to reduce the ridge at the home button, but that's also a little less protective.
I simply ordered an $8 pair of Spigens from Amazon and had them in two days.
It seems that way but I've not directly compared them with any others on a side-by-side basis.
I can say that I'm extremely happy with it. Particularly since it cost $8 on Amazon.
I'm unsure why they're no longer available on Amazon though.