It's not about being cheap, it's about not paying for a license twice. I'm not planning to clone hard disks either.
If when you buy a license for OS X you get it for all your computers, I don't understand why you don't get this benefit when you buy a license through another computer.
Does anybody have an official link about this?
Hi. At the risk of being called cheap or some other thing, please allow me to add my perspective to this whole thing - context. You see much like several of the people here asking the questions about Lion, I went through the same thought process BEFORE purchasing the new 2011 MBA. It's about the thought process, not the $30. You see I did purchase and love the 2010 MBA about six months ago! And absolutely loved it.
However I do need the backlit keyboard for work and the added processor is a good bonus, but still it's a hard sell (to buy ANOTHER MBA) given that I also have a 21-inch iMac.
Out comes Lion and is available for ALL AUTHORIZED MACS (Apple's own term) for $29+. Now do the math. I could just pay $29 for my current MBA and the iMac - which is the normal and sane thing to do.
However I am fortunate to have a friend volunteer to buy my current 2010 MBA! So when I do the sums (and add in the amount I would have paid, $30 for Lion); I now find that adding in the backlit keyboard, better processor AND Lion (for which I would have happily paid for the iMac / old MBA) would set me back for about $200+. So I hope you can see that in this context, that is why someone (and I) would be asking about the ability to transfer said license to another Mac. Cause it was in our thought process.
I know it probably wouldn't have paid a significant part or made a difference, but it a factor. Please consider this before you rant on someone or call them cheap.
Being Mac users, imply you've already made an implicit choice to think more about your purchases... failing to understand that in others and then presuming their motives isn't cool.
~ waits for backlash ~