Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

cosmichobo

macrumors 65816
Original poster
May 4, 2006
1,018
670
G'day,

My first thought when I heard about a facial recognition system to unlock an iPhone was - Oh, much easier for the FBI to access - just need to wave the phone in front of their person-of-interest's face and gain access - whether they are willing, dead, or alive...

Has this had any kind of test as yet?

cheers

cosmic
 
G'day,

My first thought when I heard about a facial recognition system to unlock an iPhone was - Oh, much easier for the FBI to access - just need to wave the phone in front of their person-of-interest's face and gain access - whether they are willing, dead, or alive...

Has this had any kind of test as yet?

cheers

cosmic

And they could not use a dead person’s finger to access via Touch ID? How is Face ID easier than that?

If I am dead, I am not worried about my phone, just saying. Least of all law enforcement getting in.
 
The dead would have to show the phone attention. Unless the dearly departed had already deactivated attention awareness.

Incidentally, it’s my understanding that Touch ID only works with living, attached fingers with a blood flow. But to be clear, I’ve not tested this.
 
And they could not use a dead person’s finger to access via Touch ID? How is Face ID easier than that?

TouchID won't work on a dead or severed finger. I think it needs to detect body heat or circulation or something. Disturbingly enough, people frequently asked about this back in 2014 when people were concerned about thieves severing fingers along with stealing phones. Back then, just like now, people came up with the most absurd scenarios to worry about.
 
Last edited:
G'day,

My first thought when I heard about a facial recognition system to unlock an iPhone was - Oh, much easier for the FBI to access - just need to wave the phone in front of their person-of-interest's face and gain access - whether they are willing, dead, or alive...

Has this had any kind of test as yet?

cheers

cosmic
With access to Software(the corpse), there no protection, regardless if its TouchID or FaceID, and as long it’s not rotten. Lol
 
TouchID won't won't work on a dead or severed finger. I think it needs to detect body heat or circulation or something. Disturbingly enough, people frequently asked about this back in 2014 when people were concerned about thieves severing fingers along with steal phones. Back then, just like now, people came up with the most absurd scenarios to worry about.

Did anyone try it on someone freshly dead and still warm? (I am kidding, I find all these what ifs absurd, as well).
[doublepost=1510755206][/doublepost]
LOL. I can see the next thread..."If someone cuts my face off and puts it over their face, will Face ID unlock my phone?"

They can do a remake of Face/Off*!

*No thanks
 
Good point re using finger on older iPhones - makes one wonder whether the FBI/etc have done that already.

And... to be fair... I did google this question before asking it... but could only find speculation, typically from before the phone actually was in the hands of living people...
 
TouchID won't work on a dead or severed finger. I think it needs to detect body heat or circulation or something. Disturbingly enough, people frequently asked about this back in 2014 when people were concerned about thieves severing fingers along with stealing phones. Back then, just like now, people came up with the most absurd scenarios to worry about.

I have heard stories where a gummy bear cut correctly and finger printed will open finger ID. Does not need to be alive. The sensor is not looking for body heat or blood flow.
 
Good point re using finger on older iPhones - makes one wonder whether the FBI/etc have done that already.

And... to be fair... I did google this question before asking it... but could only find speculation, typically from before the phone actually was in the hands of living people...
You DO realize what you're asking right? If anyone was living, setup their Face ID, then they died and someone tested if their corpse could still unlock the phone.

How, exactly, would you expect someone to test this? :)

Edit: Oh, and they must have done this since the 3rd....so in the last 12 days, someone was alive, got an iPhone X, set it up, then died and one of their loved ones used their body to hack into their phone.

Brilliant. :)
 
You DO realize what you're asking right? If anyone was living, setup their Face ID, then they died and someone tested if their corpse could still unlock the phone.

How, exactly, would you expect someone to test this? :)

Edit: Oh, and they must have done this since the 3rd....so in the last 12 days, someone was alive, got an iPhone X, set it up, then died and one of their loved ones used their body to hack into their phone.

Brilliant. :)
Maybe there are some medical examiners under us here, who likes to play marionette after work?!
 
Isn't it true that if a phone remains locked for 48 hours, you HAVE to use the passcode as it disables the finger/face id function?
 
Last edited:
Legalities and ethics aside, yes it would work.
I don’t think there are any legalities preventing this in the UK. A friend’s partner committed suicide in their home and the police took the phone from the body’s pocket and accessed it. As far as i’m aware it wasn’t an iPhone and didn’t have any sort of touch authentication so how they got into it, I’m not sure. The phone was not returned until several weeks later and evidence obtained from the phone was used at the inquest several months later - some of it coming as a surprise to the immediate family and all of it was published in the local newspaper by the court reporter.

I was absolutely horrified at the complete lack of privacy in death, especially considering how much protection there is for living peoples’ privacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Maybe there are some medical examiners under us here, who likes to play marionette after work?!
Ah, but setting up Face ID, then validating its use, both with a corpse, really isn't the use case we're talking about here. The owner has to be alive first.

Just doing it entirely with corpses, you may as well just do it with dolls. *ahem* I mean test. Heh. That sentence taken out of context. hehe
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44267547
...interesting this was your first thought (FBI scanning dead body). Talk about red flags.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.