i have no doubt it will be a "quiet" update sometime in the next month or so. my imac arrives today but its going straight back.
i have no doubt it will be a "quiet" update sometime in the next month or so. my imac arrives today but its going straight back.
The important thing to remember is the 675mx in the iMac is NOT the same in these benchmarks...its is actually a 680m renamed 675mx just for apple. a look at cuda core count verifies that...so the imac 675mx and 680mx are only 800 points apart...which explains the small upgrade price to the 680mx
So your going to send it back. I think I should too. I'm haunted by the idea that it might have some sort of gtx 780mx (discrete Titan) and pcie attached ssd
I'm not in the US - our online refurb store doesn't currently have any iMacs.
Interesting on the Bly-ray drive - will it play Blu-ray Discs?
So your going to send it back. I think I should too. I'm haunted by the idea that it might have some sort of gtx 780mx (discrete Titan) and pcie attached ssd
Intel has already replaced a lot of low end gpus, but their IGPs have gotten a lot better. My first laptop had a Radeon VE- a stripped down Radeon 7000 and could barely run Return to Castle Wolfenstein at the lowest resolution and settings. Now the Intel HD 3000 on my Macbook Pro can run Starcraft 2 at 1280x800 and at medium settings.What about the possibility of haswell integrated HD 5000 replacing dedicated you in at least the low-end?
What is the exact difference between mobile and desktop class processors? Because I could consider getting a Mac mini -it's way more upgradable and affordable, but only has integrated graphics. A haswell Mac mini could be nice.
Still, I'm pretty sure I can no longer wait. Improved SSD bus and future proofing the wifi is about all that would be improved in a silent update I think. Maybe 256 gb fusion? I don't know. But as mentioned invisible waiting game vs not having a computer at all? I think I may bite in a current iMac.
Intel has already replaced a lot of low end gpus, but their IGPs have gotten a lot better. My first laptop had a Radeon VE- a stripped down Radeon 7000 and could barely run Return to Castle Wolfenstein at the lowest resolution and settings. Now the Intel HD 3000 on my Macbook Pro can run Starcraft 2 at 1280x800 and at medium settings.
You won't see the HD 5000 on the iMac because of the display size. To run a computer with a huge display size you need memory bandwidth and IGPs are limited by the speed of the RAM, whereas discrete GPUs have their own RAM speed to play around with.
Desktop GPUs are clocked higher. Waaaay higher. That includes memory bandwidth too. My GTX 660 Ti has 1344 shaders and on turbo the clock runs at 1.2GHz.
But it seems you can get a quad core i7 Mac mini for cheaper than an quad core i5 iMac.
So i think i'm just going to stick with it, maybe a year or two from now, when i have this computer i can hold out and play the waiting game for the next one. But for now, there's 4-7 days until my new computer arrives![]()
Intel has already replaced a lot of low end gpus, but their IGPs have gotten a lot better. My first laptop had a Radeon VE- a stripped down Radeon 7000 and could barely run Return to Castle Wolfenstein at the lowest resolution and settings. Now the Intel HD 3000 on my Macbook Pro can run Starcraft 2 at 1280x800 and at medium settings.
You won't see the HD 5000 on the iMac because of the display size. To run a computer with a huge display size you need memory bandwidth and IGPs are limited by the speed of the RAM, whereas discrete GPUs have their own RAM speed to play around with.
Desktop GPUs are clocked higher. Waaaay higher. That includes memory bandwidth too. My GTX 660 Ti has 1344 shaders and on turbo the clock runs at 1.2GHz.
Congratslet me know how you like the 27"!
![]()
Actually the iMac uses desktop CPUs. Yes, but the mini doesn't have an expensive display as part of its price. Also different graphics, etc.Thanks for the insights.
Doesn't the iMac run a mobile GPU though?
I also meant to ask what the primary difference in class of mobile CPUs vs desktop. I guess maybe the same answer - clocked higher.
But it seems you can get a quad core i7 Mac mini for cheaper than an quad core i5 iMac.
Thanks for the insights.
Doesn't the iMac run a mobile GPU though?
I also meant to ask what the primary difference in class of mobile CPUs vs desktop. I guess maybe the same answer - clocked higher.
But it seems you can get a quad core i7 Mac mini for cheaper than an quad core i5 iMac.
Ok i'm going to admit, i did end up cancelling my order
I've already owned an iMac for a few weeks and sent it back to get the SSD option which may have started this whole debacle. I'm not exactly sure what i'm doing at the moment, and the best thing to do right now is wait. My options are, build a gaming computer for the gaming side of things (half of what i was going to use the iMac for) and buy a rMBP 13" or 15". Or i could wait until the iMac refresh and then proceed from there... So much uncertainty.
I actually already had a rmbp for gaming. It ran far too hot for the games I wanted to play, and I wanted to get back into the pc gaming space properly, and I didn't think a laptop would do what I needed it too. I'm thinking a custom desktop pc for gaming as a little project as I can get far more power for much less. And get the new 15"rmbp when it comes out?