He makes Gorden Gecko look like Mother Teresa
No idea what your lovely graphic is meant to say, but if you are as mystified by the movement of stocks as you seem to be, then one has to wonder what you understand about the markets.
In short, it is not. In fact large stockholders are required by SEC rules to disclose transactions, and last I checked, anyone is perfectly entitled to express their opinions about anything they like.
No they lost 1500$ and the price would likely go back up.
Here is the definition of "pump and dump" from Investopedia:
"Definition of 'Pump And Dump'
A scheme that attempts to boost the price of a stock through recommendations based on false, misleading or greatly exaggerated statements. The perpetrators of this scheme, who already have an established position in the company's stock, sell their positions after the hype has led to a higher share price."
This is exactly what Icahn is trying to do: artificially inflate the stock value by having other investors anticipate an unlikely large buyback. That would decrease the number of shares and increase the share of the company each of these other investors owns. This can cause a frenzy of buying raising the price. The he sells a large quantity of the stock causing its price to fall like a rock while he walks away even richer.
Really? You think so? Any other words of wisdom, oh great one?
I'm so glad I have you to guide me.
I know more than one or two billionaires, most are not that smart.
Icahn has a history of making his money by buying a bunch of stock in a company, getting on the board, gutting the company, walking off with a bunch of cash while the former company faces bankruptcy. I would not be surprised if Icahn was not working with Samsung in some kind of hostile takeover gambit, probably with multiple third party proxies.
If the stock is undervalued, why doesn't he buy more?
No idea what your lovely graphic is meant to say, but if you are as mystified by the movement of stocks as you seem to be, then one has to wonder what you understand about the markets.
something I have learned over the last 10 years is that many of these so called billionaires are not true billionaires they all playing chancer with the banks money
its obvious he needs a quick return to confer the interest he owes someone else
The Glaziers, Hicks, Gillete were never billionaires either
It's honestly not that bad of an idea if the company feels they are undervalued. For instance, if you feel your stock is undervalued by 20%, you are essentially buying dollar bills for 20% off.
Who wouldn't do that? Especially with the knowledge of what products they have in the pipeline and the direction they feel the company is going in?
ROFL!!! Someone can't count
10k * 2 = 20k
10k * .6 = 6k
he lost 14k as the original statement is correct and you can't count!
nice, using his own name against himIcahn't stand this guy and his schemes.
By your interpretation of the definition any statement made by any analyst or firm would be pump and dump. When Goldman puts a strong buy rating on Apple they are making investors anticipate that the stock going up. Nothing that Icahn is doing is illegal or even immoral. And I seriously doubt that Icahn selling his stock would have any more than a very very temporary dip in the stock. 2.5 Billion is a lot, but not a lot Apple's outstanding stock.
That is why, many work through proxies.
You have the right to express any opinion you like, just so long as you are not using your public position to manipulate stocks you own. (The rules are complex and that was an over simplification, but you get the idea.)
Exactly, Gross worth is meaningless. If you have 500 million in cash and assets, but you owe 1.5 billion, you are not rich, you are worse than broke. The average person living in the shelter is better off than you.
Edited to change stupid math error.