Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Luis Ortega

macrumors 65816
Original poster
May 10, 2007
1,198
386
I like to use a flap case on my iphone to protect the front glass as well as the sides and back, but I can't find a phone case that doesn't cause the flash to turn the photo flat and grey.
When I take the same shot without a case, the flash works well but with the case on the photos are useless.
I have tried to cut the lens/flash hole in the case bigger, but this didn't work.
Can anyone suggest a case with a front flap that also allows the camera flash to work without interference?
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
I know that I need a larger camera/flash opening to avoid the flare and interference in the shot when the flash fires, but I can only find those in body cases.
I want a flap case with a good rear opening for the flash and lens.
 
So I guess there really was a reason why Speck made their cutouts even bigger.

They've already enlarged them once. It used to be a form factor fitting at the back for Speck cases but ended up being more of an ovular/rectangle full cut-out around the camera. I don't think there was any necessity for further cut-outs.
 
They've already enlarged them once. It used to be a form factor fitting at the back for Speck cases but ended up being more of an ovular/rectangle full cut-out around the camera. I don't think there was any necessity for further cut-outs.

Eh. I actually like it lol. It looks different :p Is that weird?
 
Eh. I actually like it lol. It looks different :p Is that weird?

I thought it looked nice, but protection wise, would it not let more things get under the case? :S

It doesn't worry me too much, I'll put on a full-body protector, but still...
 
I thought it looked nice, but protection wise, would it not let more things get under the case? :S

It doesn't worry me too much, I'll put on a full-body protector, but still...

I don't think so. it'll only hit the part thats exposed. But ill be using a back film too :]
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.