Catch: How Apple Could Integrate Note-Taking Capabilities into Reminders, Siri, Maps, and More

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
47,608
9,398



Before shutting its doors in August of 2013 following an acquisition by Apple that was revealed this morning, Catch operated a web-based note taking service and iOS and Android apps known as Catch Notes. Ahead of the company's acquisition, Catch Notes was well-known as a high-quality productivity app and had been featured by Apple as a new and noteworthy app when it was first released in 2010 and as part of the Apple's "Why You'll Love an iPhone" advertising campaign.

Designed for note taking, Catch Notes allowed users to capture and share ideas, writing notes in text, saving images, and recording voice notes. It functioned similarly to Evernote, organizing notes into different categories that could be easily shared with others. Deep organization was one of the key features of Catch Notes, which organized notes into "Spaces" or folders that included tags for labeling. Spaces could be manipulated with simple touch gestures, giving Catch Notes an easy-to-use interface. The app also organized notes into "Streams,"

In addition to bundling a variety of note formats into a single note-taking app, Catch Notes also included task-oriented functionality like checklists and reminders, along with a lot of collaborative features. With Catch Notes, for instance, users could create a task list or note that was shared and synced between multiple people. Collaborative content was organized into "Streams," which aggregated a collection of notes that could be used to allow multiple users to contribute to and build upon a single idea, even functioning as an ongoing conversation.

Shortly before Catch shut down its services, the company also launched Catch Team, designed to make team collaboration both easier and more secure through the implementation of "team leader" functionality allowing an admin to manage individual users.

It is impossible to predict how Catch and its Evernote-style note-taking capabilities might be incorporated into Apple's OS X and iOS operating systems, but there are multiple possible use cases for the technology, across Notes, Reminders, Siri, and Maps.

Notes and Reminders

Catch's base functionality, which included note taking that incorporated both images and audio clips, is an easy to imagine expansion for Apple's own Notes and Reminders apps. Currently, Notes and Reminders are limited to text functionality, though voice dictation can be used to transcribe text. With design elements taken from Catch Notes, notes, reminders, and checklists could be created from and include both audio clips and photos or other images directly within a note or reminder.

Catch Notes used a tag-based system for organizing notes, much like Finder in OS X. While Reminders incorporates colored tags as well, a more unified tagging system across Reminders and Notes apps for both iOS and OS X could make Apple's productivity apps far more functional by facilitating quicker searches for relevant content.

The collaborative features within Catch Notes could also be useful within the Reminders and Notes apps, allowing users to easily share content over iCloud. With collaboration, deeper functionality, and better organization for the Notes app, Apple's built-in productivity software could edge closer to competing with more robust solutions like Evernote, which was formerly one of Catch's competitors.

Catch also had an innovative click-wheel style menu system that was simple to use for the creation of new content, along with visual notifications, and it is possible that some of these design elements could make it into Apple's apps in the future.

Siri and iCloud

An expanded Evernote-like note and reminder functionality bundled into Apple's own Notes and Reminders apps could also be extended to Siri, allowing the service to potentially capture voice-based notes to be remembered later.

Catch's robust syncing capabilities, which allowed content to be synced to multiple iOS devices and multiple user accounts, is also technology that Apple could look into incorporating into future versions of iOS and iCloud.

Maps

Along with its Catch Note app, Catch also operated an Android App called Compass, which was a location-based app that allowed users to make location-based notes about individual places, similar to how Foursquare allows users to leave tips on each location within the app.
New to Compass? Compass is our location-based app that allows you to always know where North is, save your favorite locations, navigate back to them (with Google Maps), and take notes about a location.
It is possible that Apple could use this location-based note-taking technology in order to expand its mapping capabilities, as it has worked hard in recent months to beef up its Maps app through the acquisition of several Mapping apps including Embark, Locationary, and HopStop. Aggregating location-based notes could be a way for Apple to introduce location discovery and additional points of interest to Maps.

Catch was shut down in August of 2013 and according to recent reports, was acquired by Apple during the same month. It remains unknown when or how Apple will incorporate the purchase into its own products, but at this time, several former Catch employees are now working at Apple on iOS-related software.

Article Link: Catch: How Apple Could Integrate Note-Taking Capabilities into Reminders, Siri, Maps, and More
 

SeenJeen

macrumors regular
Jul 16, 2009
209
42
It would be pretty brilliant to have a chronological journal of all your actions in one central place. Notes you've highlighted from websites, pictures you've taken, places you've been, reminders, notes, conversations...

I use Evernote, but its lack of integration with the whole OS sucks. I know it's not Evernote's fault, either.
 

macduke

macrumors G4
Jun 27, 2007
10,710
14,324
Central U.S.
I just want to type a query into Apple Maps and get relevant results. I've found that the directions seem to be getting more reliable, but actually finding results that match what you're looking for is tricky. Switching to Google maps, the results are higher quality. I hate the Google Maps navigation voice though.

Apple needs to get better at search. I'm not saying they need to become a search engine company. There is a difference.
 

thelookingglass

macrumors 68000
Apr 27, 2005
1,901
310
I just want to type a query into Apple Maps and get relevant results. I've found that the directions seem to be getting more reliable, but actually finding results that match what you're looking for is tricky. Switching to Google maps, the results are higher quality. I hate the Google Maps navigation voice though.

Apple needs to get better at search. I'm not saying they need to become a search engine company. There is a difference.
Completely agree. Apple's relative lack of expertise in search is glaringly obvious when performing a search in Maps vs a search in Google Maps. It's a night and day difference. Thank god Google came out with an iOS version of Google Maps - it's so much more robust than Apple's Maps.
 

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
12,185
14,464
I just want to type a query into Apple Maps and get relevant results. I've found that the directions seem to be getting more reliable, but actually finding results that match what you're looking for is tricky. Switching to Google maps, the results are higher quality. I hate the Google Maps navigation voice though.

Apple needs to get better at search. I'm not saying they need to become a search engine company. There is a difference.
Completely agree. Apple's relative lack of expertise in search is glaringly obvious when performing a search in Maps vs a search in Google Maps. It's a night and day difference. Thank god Google came out with an iOS version of Google Maps - it's so much more robust than Apple's Maps.
It's not that Google's searching is better when it comes to maps, its actually that Google has a much bigger database to search through. Map search results are not the same as web searching results, Google has had MUCH more time to build up.
 

158274

macrumors member
Nov 29, 2013
35
0
It's not that Google's searching is better when it comes to maps, its actually that Google has a much bigger database to search through. Map search results are not the same as web searching results, Google has had MUCH more time to build up.
No, it's not a matter of data, Google's search algorithms are actually better. Many times I've searched for a store or a restaurant in Apple Maps and not getting any relevant results, I almost concluded that they didn't have it in their database... then I zoom into the exactly street corner where I know it is, and lo and behold, there it is, clearly labeled. Other times I have to specify my city, while Google Maps automatically infers from my location data and provides me more relevant results.
 

Nickerbocker

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2012
244
43
I just want to type a query into Apple Maps and get relevant results. I've found that the directions seem to be getting more reliable, but actually finding results that match what you're looking for is tricky. Switching to Google maps, the results are higher quality. I hate the Google Maps navigation voice though.

Apple needs to get better at search. I'm not saying they need to become a search engine company. There is a difference.
Tell me about it! Trying to direct Apple Maps to La Quinta by the airport in Austin TX can turn into quite the effort if you do not know the exact street name, for example.

----------

No, it's not a matter of data, Google's search algorithms are actually better. Many times I've searched for a store or a restaurant in Apple Maps and not getting any relevant results, I almost concluded that they didn't have it in their database... then I zoom into the exactly street corner where I know it is, and lo and behold, there it is, clearly labeled. Other times I have to specify my city, while Google Maps automatically infers from my location data and provides me more relevant results.
That is true, but it is not just the map data but the user search data that Google has more of and seems to be good at leveraging.
 

charlituna

macrumors G3
Jun 11, 2008
9,631
815
Los Angeles, CA
If they used Catch to replace the current Notes app it would already be a major improvement. iOS Notes rather sucks when you consider you can't do things from the Mac version like transfer notes between accounts, include images or even view included ones from Mac version
 

kis

macrumors 68000
Aug 10, 2007
1,702
765
Switzerland
Well, I can now say bye-bye to the Android app, I'm guessing :-/ Next thing, Google will probably acquire Evernote and multi-platform note-taking is a thing of the past, due to the large tech companies' moronic little war.
 

FieldingMellish

Suspended
Jun 20, 2010
2,440
3,107
Developers for apps like Catch create their own language of its facets of control, a language much like that invented by Starbucks. Looking into it’s various features, Catch developers are essentially describing OmniFocus for iPhone, developed long ago by Omnigroup. http://www.omnigroup.com
 

Jynto

macrumors 6502
Jan 16, 2012
356
92
Nottingham, UK
Well, I can now say bye-bye to the Android app, I'm guessing :-/ Next thing, Google will probably acquire Evernote and multi-platform note-taking is a thing of the past, due to the large tech companies' moronic little war.
Fortunately that's not likely to happen. Evernote Corp would not sell themselves out like that. They have publicly stated that they want to be around for 100 years, and whilst that does sound a bit presumptuous for a tech company, it does mean that your notes are safe.

Trust me, I've seen the future.
 

Gutwrench

Contributor
Jan 2, 2011
4,324
9,888
I liked Catch but my chief complaint was its' date display. A note or comment added would only display a date duration rather than the actual date or date-timestamp it was entered.

Displaying a note was created "17 days ago" was useless to me.
I needed a date-timestamp to document the notes/comments.
 

cgsnipinva

macrumors 6502
Jan 29, 2013
299
204
Leesburg, VA
If they used Catch to replace the current Notes app it would already be a major improvement. iOS Notes rather sucks when you consider you can't do things from the Mac version like transfer notes between accounts, include images or even view included ones from Mac version
It would also be a great part of their iWork Apps in OS X like One Note is for MS Office.
 

powers74

macrumors 68000
Aug 18, 2008
1,852
14
At the bend in the river
Never been a fan of the roundel interface. Never liked it in Alias. Never liked it in Sketchbook Pro. Takes up space weirdly, and just never seemed faster to me. But then again, what the hell do I know.
 

macduke

macrumors G4
Jun 27, 2007
10,710
14,324
Central U.S.
It's not that Google's searching is better when it comes to maps, its actually that Google has a much bigger database to search through. Map search results are not the same as web searching results, Google has had MUCH more time to build up.
While their database might be bigger, there are certainly instances where Apple Maps finds the same places but you need to be much more specific. So it isn't cross referencing different terms that have similar meanings.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.