Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,142
38,920



Speaking today at the Business Insider Ignition Conference in New York City, CBS CEO Les Moonves made some statements suggesting Apple may have put the development of its rumored television streaming service on hold.

"They've had conversations on it and I think they pressed the hold button," Moonves said, referencing prior talks CBS has had with Apple about joining its subscription service. Apple and CBS were reportedly negotiating prices before Apple paused the discussions.
Today, Moonves said that Apple and CBS were close to settling on a price point of between $30 and $40 per month for these bundles -- Moonves specifically mentioned the price point of $35 multiple times -- before Apple decided to pause and reconsider.
Apple's streaming television service was originally rumored to be launching alongside the new Apple TV, but Apple has had ongoing trouble establishing deals with content providers. Difficulty securing content deals has delayed and shifted Apple's television plans for years, but in 2015, it looked like a things were coming together for a subscription service.

appletvos-800x508.jpg

In May, Moonves, who has been very open with his comments on CBS' negotiations with Apple, said Apple and CBS were still in talks and that CBS would "probably" ink a deal with the Cupertino company. At the time, he had recently met with Eddy Cue and said he was "very excited" about Apple's service. In October, he made similar statements, suggesting discussions between the two companies had not progressed further towards a deal.

Rumors have suggested Apple is aiming for a web-based streaming service that would bundle approximately 25 channels for $30 to $40 per month. Earlier this year, Apple was said to be in discussions with several content providers in addition to CBS, including ABC, Fox, Disney, Viacom, and Discovery.

Given Moonves' comments and the general lack of recent rumors, it is not clear when Apple will launch its streaming television service. An August report from Bloomberg suggested negotiation troubles had delayed its release until 2016, but there's been no word on Apple's plans beyond that. There are a lot of factors involved in the launch of the streaming service, as Apple needs to secure deals with dozens of content providers, including local affiliates.

Moonves believes Apple's streaming television service, or something like it, will launch in the near future. "This will happen," he told Business Insider. "People will not be spending money on channels they don't want to watch."

Update: Citing sources familiar with the matter, Bloomberg has confirmed that Apple has suspended its plans to offer a web-based streaming television service and will instead focus on "being a platform for media companies to sell directly to customers through its App Store."

Apple is not "giving up entirely" on a TV service, but it has not been able to secure deals that would allow it to sell a package of channels for $30 to $40 per month as media companies want more money for content.

Article Link: CBS CEO: Apple's 'Pressed the Hold Button' on Streaming TV Service [Update: Bloomberg Confirms]
 
Why doesn't Apple just do their own video hosting platform, kind of like a not sucky YouTube, and cut these guys off at the knees? We saw the consequences of Apple providing a platform for developers to deliver apps, why not videos?? They've got Capture (Phones) and Editing, why not Delivery and Monetization?
 
Hulu just needs to add a Live TV tier, because otherwise it has nailed almost everything about streaming TV episodes. If Apple decides to do anything TV related, it would need a Hulu-style "DVR" at a minimum. I guess like PlayStation Vue, just not as limited.
 
Maybe Apple is starting to realize that it sucks at online services. Apple should give up on their streaming ambitions (both TV, Music, etc.) and just focus on developing quality stock apps and let the third party developers work their magic.
 
Not sure why I would pay $35 when commercial-free Hulu only costs $12. I get all the big network shows except for CBS. And I don't know of anything I'd want on CBS that I'd be willing to pay an extra $23 for.

However, if they throw in ESPN (not ESPN3), FOX Sports, FX (for Fargo), AMC (for Better Call Saul and TWD), BBC America (Orphan Black), and Discovery, I *might* consider it. But then it's just a cable service with a better interface.
 
Hulu just needs to add a Live TV tier, because otherwise it has nailed almost everything about streaming TV episodes. If Apple decides to do anything TV related, it would need a Hulu-style "DVR" at a minimum. I guess like PlayStation Vue, just not as limited.
The Hulu app on Apple TV 4 is very slow
 
Maybe Apple is starting to realize that it sucks at online services. Apple should give up on their streaming ambitions (both TV, Music, etc.) and just focus on developing quality stock apps and let the third party developers work their magic.
My guess is that they purposely don't put too much effort on stock apps (with a few exceptions - Maps and Music - services that generate revenue). They want them to be adequately functional, but if they make them too well, it'll discourage app developers. They may even try to raise the bar a bit (like the current Notes), but it's actually in their best interests to *not* create the best apps. Fewer third party apps would be detrimental to their App Store, thus detrimental to the iPhone.
 
I want a list of items with toggles on them, similar to how we toggle mail, contacts, calendars in our mail settings. One for each channel that offers streaming, and each one that i toggle is between 4.99 and 9.99/month.

CBS [x] 4.99
NBC [x] 4.99
CNN [x] 4.99
Live MLB with no local blackout BS [x] 9.99
Live NFL with no local blackout BS [x] 9.99
Fox [x] 6.66

...

list of 100 channels my cable provider offers me but I never watch because their crap [ ] 9.99


This would make me a happy panda
 
For god's sakes.. how long does apple have to treat this as a hobby?!! Like with iCloud, when are they going to figure out how to do this right? Years and years go by and Apple TV is just a hobby and icloud remains a disaster!
 
I think the tough part is that since everything is bundled, cord cutters still pay 75% of their prior monthly cost for "just internet" now. It's not a bargain because cableco is gonna get you anyhow.

Exactly! There is minimal cost savings to make this venture a plausible alternative to the status quo. The industry is in dire need of regional and national Internet only service providers.
 
As much as i would love for apple to start a cable service, i think they are reconsidering the idea that young folks value paying $35-40 for TV. I dont think the argument that cable is old technology and i want a la carte is compelling. The value of TV has gone down just like with music. Blame netflix but i always here people say netflix all i need or i wont pay more than 20 bucks.
 
Moonves believes Apple's streaming television service, or something like it, will launch in the near future. "This will happen," he told Business Insider. "People will not be spending money on channels they don't want to watch."

Les, you got that right! But be careful what you ask for - CBS is not a channel I want to watch!

Hulu just needs to add a Live TV tier, because otherwise it has nailed almost everything about streaming TV episodes. If Apple decides to do anything TV related, it would need a Hulu-style "DVR" at a minimum. I guess like PlayStation Vue, just not as limited.

The Hulu app on Apple TV 4 is very slow

Besides being slow, Hulu has virtually no back catalog of TV shows. For now, Hulu is necessary only for current season content - Netflix offers superior selection, interface, and performance for back catalog shows (which is most of what I watch.)
 
"People will not be spending money on channels they don't want to watch."

Now there's a concept. Finally! maybe the media companies are waking up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slix
I think the tough part is that since everything is bundled, cord cutters still pay 75% of their prior monthly cost for "just internet" now. It's not a bargain because cableco is gonna get you anyhow.
I recently signed up for a Netflix trial and got a message from my ISP that I went over my data cap but since it was the first time they would wave the $10 fee. How do people who go OTT not butt up against their data caps?

"People will not be spending money on channels they don't want to watch."

Now there's a concept. Finally! maybe the media companies are waking up.

Except for ESPN where pretty much nobody has a choice.

Maybe Apple is starting to realize that it sucks at online services. Apple should give up on their streaming ambitions (both TV, Music, etc.) and just focus on developing quality stock apps and let the third party developers work their magic.
Or perhaps Steve Jobs was the "closer" and Eddy Cue doesn't have the same clout?
 
Not sure why I would pay $35 when commercial-free Hulu only costs $12. I get all the big network shows except for CBS. And I don't know of anything I'd want on CBS that I'd be willing to pay an extra $23 for.

I think it depends on what is included on the service if it will be a good deal. With all the conflicting rumors, it is hard to say what the final service will look like.

If the service includes all past seasons of all past shows of the participating networks, along with all current seasons available to stream on demand, then this service will be a Hulu+Netflix killer.

Anything less, then I am not sure how it will compete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vanilla35
Maybe Apple is starting to realize that it sucks at online services. Apple should give up on their streaming ambitions (both TV, Music, etc.) and just focus on developing quality stock apps and let the third party developers work their magic.

I agree and I really don't get why. Curious to know why a company with Apple's resources (and experience!!) does such a crap job with streaming services. With their hardware install base, they could just flat out dominate streaming video, streaming music, live TV, etc. I mean wtf?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.