Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

aicul

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
My certificate for OSX server has expired.

This server is for family stuff so quite frankly I don't see the use for an expensive certificate.

I was wondering about the self-signed certificates and whether this was an acceptable option given the "family" orientation of the server.

Is there a impending "don't do this" reason I should be aware of ?
 
I've run a home OSX server for over 4 years now with just a self-signed certificate and have had no issues. You just have to manually trust it whenever a dialog pops up. Yes it's a nuisance, but it's also free, and you only have to do it once a year.
 
If you really want an NSA backdoor, and like spending money on things that have no intrinsic value, get a commercial certificate.

If you're OK without the NSA backdoor, and want to save some money, use a self-signed certificate.

You just have to manually trust it whenever a dialog pops up

A better way is to create a Certificate Authority, and then install a root certificate on the machines that will access it.
 
thanks

A better way is to create a Certificate Authority, and then install a root certificate on the machines that will access it.

sounds good, but maybe beyond my (brain) grasp. Do you have a good link for some reading ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.