Look at it this way. The warranty that any corporation provides is arbitrary. Dyson, for example, provides a three year manufacturer's warranty on its vacuum cleaners.
In the UK and Europe these manufacturer's warranties are in addition to 'statutory rights', that is; the right of the consumer to a product that performs reasonably.
Apple don't have to provide a warranty at all or they could provide one that was 1 month long. it doesn't matter. The point of consumer laws is that they disregard the manufacturer's arbitrary notion of what they consider to be a reasonable time. The law takes this notion out of the manufacturer's hands and makes it non-arbitrary. This is a good thing for the consumer because it enables a third party, the law, to make a judgement on what is a reasonable amount of time for a product to work.
It should be the right of every consumer to be able to avail themselves of this. It's a shame citizens of the US don't appear to have that opportunity.
Interesting.
I heard about that act before.
But who decides what is a reasonable amount of time for each product to function properly?
Like they have a preset document that says cellphones 2 years, a fridge 3 years, a washer 3 and so on for particular devices?
Or is it up to the judge on each case to decide?