this argument is terrible
The haters and trolls are out in full force.
this argument is terrible
Exactly. If the Touch ID is truly using a subdermal scan, it would have ignored the photo and scanned the guy's own finger to authorize it.
calling it a bypass is a bit of a stretch, more like a much much longer way around the mountain.
Honestly, kocking someone out and using their finger or holding them at gun point results in the same thing. No password, print or pin is safe. It's just a good way to minimize pesky intruders. That's all.
Except that your fingerprints are not a secret. You leave them behind everywhere you go - and even if you are trying not to.
Fingerprints left behind are the downfall of millions.
Well said. No security is perfect. Touch ID will still be a strong protection against most intruders.
You would of thought it Touch ID was the *real mcoy*, it could tell a living human finger from a fake (or printed) one...
Back to the drawing board Apple. Samsungs doing this finger print thing by the way, and guess what, this is their chance to flaw Apple in every respect. And i reckon Samsung will pull it off perfectly.
ok, i admit to this, but then its a also a longer way around the mountain for all by-passing too not just this.
This is exactly it. People go on about "Oh, but this is not an iPhone 5s" or "Oh, but it is the same guy doing the unlocking, show it with someone else", or "It is surely impossible to lift the fingerprints from that fingerprint filled Phone", or "Oh, but we knew this all along, it was never meant to be secure". Yet it is fact: They claim to have broken TouchID with a simple and really old technique.
http://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2013/ccc-breaks-apple-touchid
Even if this video is not a fake, (it's veracity is far from certain) what average iPhone thief is going to go through all that trouble to steal your phone? The answer is none. Much ado about nothing.![]()
You're standing in the kitchen on your office floor, having a great conversation over a coffee with that new intern. Let's face it, she's so beautiful.
You just put your mug in the dish washer.
Next morning you go to the restrooms, leaving your phone on the desk.
On the way out you meet your boss, who wants to have an immediate conversation with you.
An hour later, you return to your desk. The phone is gone. You try to remote wipe it, but it cannot be located.
Someone has unlocked it and put flight mode on.
You still had all the mails on it, exchanged with the lawyers regarding that new patent, that you wanted to obtain.
A simple three step process to unlock ANY iPhone
- Get stolen iPhone
- Lift a finger print from the back of the iPhone or from the glass (Most iPhone users do not wear gloves and leave finger prints all of the glass and the backs of their iPhones
- Use the lifted finger print to unlock the phone.
You don't even need access to the user or even need to know who owns the phone because the owner likely left the "un-lock key" all over the phone in multiple places
So a bunch of nerds in their parents basement with no lives managed to do something that is so absurd and over-the-top that Apple should somehow be worried... ok.![]()
You must be a comedy writer. Of course Samsung will copy Apple. That's the cornerstone of their mobile business, after all.
Obviously not all phones will have good fingerprints but some will. What does it mean? It may entice the thieves to steal as many iPhones as possible. They will be able to unlock some (those with better fingerprints). So much for security.
I thought everyone knew that Apple was the R&D arm of Samsung. Samsung will just rename it ID Touch, wrap it in a plastic shell with a 6 inch screen and call it innovation.
Bryan