It was, but Apple could have simply given general descriptors like "Good," "Normal," "Marginal" or something similar.
No doubt there would still be questions, but at least it would have prevented the "My new phone has 99% battery health!" type posts.
These forums are already overripe with battery topics where those who haven't done any research ignore general understanding and proudly proclaim that "I've kept my phone between 90-100% most of the time, and battery health is still 100%!" ergo, it's false.
That's like proclaiming that they smoke three packs a day, and can still run a marathon, or bench 200, ergo smoking has no effect on one's health.
One can choose whether to honor best practices, live a healthy lifestyle, or not, but there is no doubt that bad habits can have adverse effects, even if your one's own anecdotal experiences seem to prove otherwise.
As a practical matter, no one is obligated to follow practices to maximum the battery life of a device expected to last a few years, but the principles still apply.
And, going back to the matter of "Throttle Gate," while it may have been questionable for Apple to quietly compensate for aged batteries by reducing performance, the reaction among the general public only helped illustrate how little they know about batteries.