Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Local Devs realised they couldn't use "guanxi" to get what they want so go the western route.
 
And what happens when China decides to shut down apples manugacturing after they defy them?

That's never going to happen, because the Chinese are (state) capitalists. They can easily ban Apple from selling devices in their country if they don't apply with local regulations, whilst still manufacturing them over there.
 
Glad China talking about Monopoly, Competition, free trade....may be the logical next step is freedom and democracy!! Let there be no monopoly in political choices...
 
Yeah, unfortunately that's not a get out jail free card. Ask Google. Russia made a similar claim against Google regarding the Play Store and Google's pre-installed apps.
That case was quite different. Google forced phone makers who licensed the android software to pre install default apps. Quite a bit different than if Google had those apps on the pixel, or Apple having apps on their own phone.
 
That case was quite different. Google forced phone makers who licensed the android software to pre install default apps. Quite a bit different than if Google had those apps on the pixel, or Apple having apps on their own phone.
Not quite. Google forced phone makers who wanted to use the Google Play Store to pre-install default apps. Android is available for phone makers to use without Google apps. Lot's of OEM's go that route. Amazon did. So did Chinese OEMs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kdarling
Not quite. Google forced phone makers who wanted to use the Google Play Store to pre-install default apps. Android is available for phone makers to use without Google apps. Lot's of OEM's go that route. Amazon did. So did Chinese OEMs.
Which is still irrelevant for Apple.

These phone companies wanted access to the play store. Google could say no, and nothing illegal happens. Google chose to say yes but force a bundle of apps with the play store. Which Russia foolishly deemed illegal.

Apple doesn't allow third party pones access to the App Store. That's not violating any law.
 
Tired of Apple bending over for China


Well US plaintiffs have tried cases relating to App Store Monopoly in the good ol'US of A:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3157...-claims-of-monopoly-in-iphone-app-market.html

An appeals court has ruled that Apple must face antitrust charges in a lawsuit that alleges that the company monopolized the market for iPhone apps.

The U.S. Court for Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed Thursday a decision by a lower court and ruled that the app buyers filing the lawsuit are direct purchasers of iPhone apps from Apple, rather than from app developers, and hence have standing to sue. Apple was a distributor of iPhone apps, selling them directly to buyers through its App Store, according to the court.

Probably relevant:
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/01/12/14-15000.pdf
 
  • Like
Reactions: tongxinshe
Which is still irrelevant for Apple.

These phone companies wanted access to the play store. Google could say no, and nothing illegal happens. Google chose to say yes but force a bundle of apps with the play store. Which Russia foolishly deemed illegal.

Apple doesn't allow third party pones access to the App Store. That's not violating any law.
Even though I agree the Russian decision was without merit, that's a fairly odd characterization of access to the Play Store. It's also besides the point.

The point I was making was about the similarities regarding the claim of monopolistic behavior. Both cases made that claim and both are wrong in my opinion.
 
First of all this appears to be a case brought about by private individuals - similar to the hundreds of class action suits in the USA.

As for Chinese governmental demands of, for example, local servers - I should say it makes sense from their point of view: they are tired of NSA, FBI et al having access to their citizen's data. I'm sure whichever country you're in would also have politicians and a public supporting such rules.

UK and Australia are starting to make similar demands and would love to implement VPN blocking given half a chance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_blocking_in_the_United_Kingdom
https://torrentfreak.com/uk-internet-filter-blocks-vpns-australia-to-follow-soon-130905/
china wants access to our citizen's data.
 
It's actually the opposite. China's overall economy doesn't have the growth levels that it used to and manufacturing is guaranteed to move to other places that are cheaper than China in the next couple of decades. They're getting more aggressive in leveraging what they have now because they know their opportunity to do so is limited.
Yeah no. That’s factually untrue. The full potential of the Chinese economy and the power of a middle class is nowhere near its full potential.
Remember, population-wise, China and India hold the most future sales potential.
Myopia is a terrible thing especially where it comes to business matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jw2002
First of all this appears to be a case brought about by private individuals - similar to the hundreds of class action suits in the USA.
Don't be surprised if/when we find out the Chinese government was behind the whole thing, a way to get even more leverage over Apple, gain control over all apps on the store, and ultimately, make a case for an encryption backdoor, while outwardly making the appearance of being hands-off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michaelgtrusa
Yeah no. That’s factually untrue. The full potential of the Chinese economy and the power of a middle class is nowhere near its full potential.
Remember, population-wise, China and India hold the most future sales potential.
Myopia is a terrible thing especially where it comes to business matters.

Not sure I agree with this assessment completely. Those markets, especially in China will be dominated by localized goods. If China has any brain power and they generally do, they will protect their industry and economy by slowly converting to local supply instead of export supply. They are decades away from outsourcing supply and have a VERY strong system that supports buying local. And by local I don't mean stuff only manufactured in China by foreign interests. India is a different story, but I'd wager once they get their heads out they will follow the same path. Use cheap labor to build up an MFG infrastructure using foreign investment then transition to self supply while Africa begins to spin up.
 
I'm kinda getting tired of this whole China demands charade (no VPNs, local servers, etc). I wish Apple would just pull out the market but I guess the money is just too good to pass......

Cook thinking that Apple will be a long-term success by depending on and trusting the Chinese government/market…..

….. is analogous to some Foolish American Tourist who "trusts" that he will remain safe for several weeks staying as a tourist in Pyongyang North Korea. Things are bound to go wrong. Horribly wrong. Eventually. It's just a matter of when.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Michaelgtrusa
I am suing Walmart for the monopoly they have inside their stores. I want to see my hand crafted iPhone covers but they will not let me. Time to get a lawyer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sefstah
CEOs need to be fully cognizant of what they are getting themselves into when going into China. https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas...-tech-firms-cave-to-beijings-rules-1502215101

It's a never ending series of bending over, bowing and scraping while losing ground and IP. I hope Tim Cook went into China with native guidance and executives from the get go. You can't go into China with a western perspective and expect it to end well.
Why do I not think he wasn’t prepared? (Double negative for emphasis)
 
Why do I not think he wasn’t prepared? (Double negative for emphasis)
Lol my morning coffee has long since expired for me to make sense of that. I hope Tim was very prepared with lots of native help. It would be fascinating to read about the process Apple went through to enter China. The groundwork to enter a completely different culture and mindset would have to be extensive given the billions of dollars he ultimately decided to commit to investing in entering China.

I'm half Asian, raised in America with a friendly southern influence thanks to all my neighbors transplanted from Virginia, West VA, and the Carolinas, and so my mom had to really do a significant amount of work to prepare me to meet my own grandmother for the first time. I did great, but at the tender age of 10, I had to wrap my mind around a completely different perspective so as to not commit any faux pas. Like don't hug your elders, ever. Not even your gran!

If I were CEO I wouldn't so much as open a small office in any Asian country without scoping out helpful natives to hire. Well, maybe Japan isn't too difficult.
 
China is the last country that should accuse any western corporation of "monopoly". Their elite good old boy system and their propensity/history of disregarding copyright laws, makes this laughable.
But, they are to “protect their respect from others” and “keep a good image to the public” by all means so they will surely do something as guise to confuse everyone, even themselves. This is a basic skill for every Chinese I strongly believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeattleMoose
Tired of Apple bending over for China
Exactly how in this case are they "bending over"?
[doublepost=1502449905][/doublepost]
I have a feeling that Tim Cook like many foreigners underestimated the complexities of expanding into China. Never underestimate the cultural differences.
And you base that on what? Just your feeling, or on actual facts from Apple? Apple has been in China for 8 years already. They have to adapt to Chinese laws like all other countries they are entering into, and they are strict and not the same as is customary in "western" countries. And they have been threatened to not be able to sell their products if they try to disregard or circumvent the laws, which is the same threat they have faced in basically all countries including the US when they are at edge of laws.

Of course they have people in China who knows how to deal with the government and local resellers. And neither are the big threat to Apple. Apples bigger problem regarding iPhone in China is like in the rest of the world, other handset makers. That includes Samsung and for Chinas part especially Huawei. In other words it is the competition, not the government or lawmakers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solomani
Are you saying Apple doesn't have a monopoly on the App Store? Because they do. I can hear the argument forming that "people can choose Android so it's not a monopoly". Please don't use that. It's not applicable. This case is specifically about iOS, the App Store, and it's environment. I don't agree with the reason for the lawsuit, but that doesn't change the parameters of it.

It's the same type of situation with Google and Russia.
Maybe you should learn what a monopoly is. Nobody forced them to be a developer for the App Store. They signed up on their own so they have to follow Apples terms and conditions. They are free to leave if they don't agree.
[doublepost=1502462564][/doublepost]Apples App Store, Apples rules. There are other choices. No monopoly going on here.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.