Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just once I want to see price drops for something instead of price hikes
 
Its nothing new, you just forgot about the reports of price increases in the past. In the 90s we used to track fires and flooding in SE Asia to anticipate RAM cost increases.
and in the 2000s we tracked those for hard drive prices.
 
This is why people should be rooting for Samsung, Intel, and other non-TSMC chip foundries to be successful. Both Samsung and Intel offer third party foundry services (though Intel has no notable external customers). If Intel were to again be competitive in manufacturing process with TSMC then Apple could pit Intel against TSMC pricing wise and threaten to have Intel start producing future generations of A, M, and other series chips. (And for the uninitiated this would not mean Apple going back to Intel's x86/x64 chips, it means Intel, or Samsung, would produce Apple's ARM chips on their own process nodes).

Competition is good!
Agree with what you're saying. But realistically, Samsung Foundry looks to be the only serious alternative out there with there 2nm GAA node architecture.
 
2nm is pretty crazy in and of itself, Francium (Fr) is 0.7nm in diameter. I wonder if I will be alive when we have subatomic processors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: navaira
They do but we don’t know what the terms are.

There could be something in there that allows TSMC to somehow increase prices.
true, don't know any detail but also keep in mind that Apple is the supply chain expert ...

Apple and TSMC are partnering on process development, TSMC can't do that on their own so they are "9n bed" together so to speak, it is a mutual relationship and has been for many years now, you don't surprise your partner ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: macbookj0e
I know nothing about economics, but why are there so many more price increases for computer components nowadays, as opposed to decades ago?
At least part of the problem is the entire world and everything we use has these high tech chips in them. In simple terms the production of such chips has not expanded at the same pace the need for them has.
 
[…]

TSMC apparently told customers, presumably including Apple, to expect pricing that is at least 50% higher than 3-nanometer processors. This was attributed to unusually high capital expenditure for the new node and to the lack of discounting strategies while yields are still in their early acceptable phase.

[…]
No sweat. Apple can afford to pay for the increase out of their pocket.
 
TSMC and Apple have contracts in place the pre-date these rumors by months/years, this is a nonsense rumor
For known tech, yeah probably.
For new tech (smaller nanometer scale) it'll be too much of an unknown to be able to price it.
The article does say "unusually high capital expenditure for the new node".
Apple probably gets first refusal but can lock down the price for the volumes it knows it can ship.
Tomorrow's 2nm A/M chips will be the chip in your Apple TV in 7 years time.
 
  • Love
Reactions: rehkram
true, don't know any detail but also keep in mind that Apple is the supply chain expert ...

Apple and TSMC are partnering on process development, TSMC can't do that on their own so they are "9n bed" together so to speak, it is a mutual relationship and has been for many years now, you don't surprise your partner ...

Yeah you’re right. Would have liked to have been a fly on the wall to see how these discussions went down!
 
The report further stated that suppliers expect flagship mobile chips built on the 2-nanometer process to carry unit prices around $280 once volume production begins. This would make it the most expensive component in the iPhone and dramatically affect Apple's profit margins, if the increase is not passed on to customers.
I suppose $280 is for the whole mobile device, not just the chip. That would be too big a jump!

I also suppose TSMC gets paid in dollars, so an increased price is to be expected with inflation.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: dannys1
Think there will be a price increase on the devices that ship with M6. Don't think there will be an increase for iPhone 18 series.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
Ultimately it boils down to supply and demand. Scarcity of resources such as rare earth minerals play a role on the supply side. And obviously with the rapid adoption of AI, demand is off the charts.
The cost to develop the N2 has been the highest in history at nearly $800 million. The wafer is expected to cost an eye watering $30,000 due to its complexity.

For reference, the 1.4 / 1.6 nm node is expected to cost $45,000+ per wafer.

If TSMC is the only game in town they can set whatever price they want. That’s not a good thing. We need more chipmakers at the cutting edge.

Really doesn’t have much to do with competition, see what I wrote above. The 3rd generation of the N2 node should be better optimized and provide significant better yields and lower costs (plus significant better performance). Because they are becoming so expensive to produce and manufacture, the N2 will likely be with us until 2030 (not without significant advancements) and 1.4 nm / 14A possibly even longer with those platforms costing significantly more.

However, the products those future platforms will allow are the thing of dreams. We will see mind blowing tech by the early 2030s with a bigger technical leap than we have seen in the last 15 years.
 
We will see mind blowing tech by the early 2030s with a bigger technical leap than we have seen in the last 15 years.
Do you have any evidence of any sort for this bold statement? If so, I would love to know what you are anticipating.
 
They have no competition. They should charge whatever they want. Market theory states that it’ll act new entrants apparently
 
It doesn't work like that on these newer nodes, the offerings of the different foundries are not compatible with each other and would force the design house to have seperate designs for each foundry - and that is not going to happen.
And remember when Apple dual-sourced the A chip years ago from TSMC and Samsung? What a disaster that was...
Vendor lock-in is a long term disaster as well. Remember when Intel was the sole Apple supplier? Stuck at 14 nm for a long time. How USA lost the fab crown is still unbelievable.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.