Chrome Apps Gaining OS X Finder Integration to Open Mac Files by Default

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 9, 2014.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    Google has launched a new feature for its experimental Chrome Canary browser for Mac, enabling a beta function that allows users to open local Mac files using Chrome apps in Finder. Using the feature, Chrome apps can be associated with OS X files, bringing Google one step closer to replacing desktop functionality with its browser.

    For example, the Chrome Text app can be used to open any Mac text file, as seen in the screenshot below. The Text app shows up as an option right alongside native options like TextEdit.

    Enabling this flag in Canary Chrome will let users choose installed Chrome apps as an option when opening an associated file, with the apps behaving as native Mac apps. As noted by Gigaom, the process functions through app manifests, which allow developers to specify which apps are compatible with different file types via file handlers.

    While the feature is currently limited to Chrome Canary for testing purposes, many Canary functions eventually make it to Google's stable Chrome browser. There is no word, however, on when the new feature might make it out of testing as there are still several bugs to work out.

    Article Link: Chrome Apps Gaining OS X Finder Integration to Open Mac Files by Default
  2. roadbloc macrumors G3


    Aug 24, 2009
  3. JackieTreehorn macrumors 6502


    May 22, 2005

    Google will be selling even more of your personal info to advertising companies.
  4. Futurix macrumors 6502


    Nov 22, 2011
    Chrome is like a parasite, embedding itself in host OS - to promote Google's web platform :eek:
  5. elmateo487 macrumors 6502a

    Jun 12, 2008
    While this is fully optional... Who would prefer their crappy web apps over ANYTHING else?

    MAYBE a business who has gone all google, and does everything in the google cloud.

  6. MacLC macrumors 6502

    Oct 18, 2013
    Exactly. It took me a while to understand Google's motives although they had made it clear early on. They want to control the world's data.

    I switched from iOS when my old phone broke and I didn't have money for an iPhone. I switched back from Android when to download even a basic app, I had to give it access to my phone book and call list.

    There is nothing a person cannot do in MS Office, iWork, or Star/Open/Libre that they can with Google docs, except unwillingly and unwittingly give away my private data to Google.

    With "free" Google software the user is the product.
  7. seamer macrumors 6502


    Jul 24, 2009
    Dear Google,

    I prefer my files to be via sublime if it has to be in a UI, or the default Pages.
  8. genovelle macrumors 6502a

    May 8, 2008
    It's optional now but chrome installs a server that runs in the background doing God knows what. We had three computers at work that were doing weird stuff including IE issues. Oddly these were the only ones that people had downloaded chrome to. After removing it we noticed the chrome server actively working in the background. Once it was gone the issues stopped.
  9. Northgrove macrumors 65816

    Aug 3, 2010
  10. gotluck macrumors 603


    Dec 8, 2011
    East Central Florida
  11. philipk macrumors 6502

    Jun 11, 2008
    No this is not tinfoil hat material. NO ONE gives away their product for free. Google has spent many hours developing their products and they want paid for it. It is clearly stated in the privacy policy.

    Google Free apps are paid for by advertising. For advertisers to get their money's worth they want it localized. Google anonymously gives private info to their clients. Many people do not mind this. I refuse to be part of it. Both choices are valid.

    Apple Free apps are paid for by selling hardware and cloud space.

    Microsoft Office apps are paid for by subscription.

    It is your choice but I strongly dislike Google's business model and have removed all their apps from OS X and Chrome from IOS.

    I may be in the minority, but I would rather pay a monthly fee for no ads and (some) privacy.
  12. Traverse macrumors 603


    Mar 11, 2013
    Yay. Google can access even more information.

    But seriously, I don't see the point of this. I don't like browser based apps. Why would I use limited apps when I have powerful native versions?
  13. DonutHands macrumors regular


    Dec 20, 2011
    Los Angeles
    Oh sweet, finally 64 bit chrome for mac!

    wait, wait, no. just some other chrome garbage getting updated first.
  14. Renzatic Suspended


    Aug 3, 2011
    Gramps, what the hell am I paying you for?
    It's entirely acceptable to not like the way Google structures its business, but at least understand exactly what they're doing.

    First, they're not giving away private data. If you used their services, they wouldn't be collecting info on a "PhilipK", you'd just be a number that gets tracked jumping from website to website, or by clicking certain advertisements. It's all analytics, and it'd be amazingly difficult to figure out who you are by the random number that's been assigned to you.

    Think of it as you being node 5570431256. Node 5570431256 likes to visit Mac forums, and also likes cameras. If a respectable number of others nodes who start out at Mac forums tend to visit camera forums, they've built up a knowledge base, and know that Mac sites are a good place to advertise cameras. Your name isn't directly tied to any of this, only your anonymous node.

    Secondly, they don't sell their analytics to companies. That'd be Google giving away their golden goose, since they'd only be able to sell that once, and it'd be entirely out of their hands. What they do instead is sell adspace. Using the example above, a camera manufacturer wants to advertise their product. They go to Google, who says "yeah, we know where to put your adverts so they get the most views", then offers up a price to do so. Google then starts placing camera ads on Mac forums.

    Now I can understand why some people wouldn't like that, but the whole setup is nowhere near as insidious as some people make it out to be. I don't use ad supported apps simply because I don't like getting ad popups, not because I'm worried about them selling my medical records off to advertisers.
  15. octothorpe8 macrumors 6502

    Feb 27, 2014
    Is that your response to any concern about privacy? Because this one is pretty clear cut.
  16. Karma*Police macrumors 68000

    Jul 15, 2012
    I agree with your cogent post. One thing that was left out however is that some Google employees do have access to people's data, including searches, comments, reviews, friends, emails, etc. Just imagine if an individual who shouldn't have access gets access to all of that data. Pretty scary stuff.
  17. philipk macrumors 6502

    Jun 11, 2008
    I pretty much agree. I don't think it is insidious. And my main reason is also not getting the pop-up ads.

    However giving them control over seeing my files on my computer does make me nervous. No matter how innocent it is. That is a huge leap beyond tracking my browser history or email content.
  18. Jessica Lares macrumors G3

    Jessica Lares

    Oct 31, 2009
    Near Dallas, Texas, USA
    This should have been introduced on the Windows version first. Most people on the Mac side don't use Chrome for web apps, they use it because it's a better browser for them, and the Google integration. Plus, the fact that Flash is built-in.

    And yes, putting a free web app next to a $70 editor was a dumb move. Although this is a great idea in general.
  19. fredaroony macrumors 6502a

    Aug 1, 2011
    How exactly would they be doing that by opening a file?


    Does your work use a shared NAS drive and thick clients for everything? I prefer cloud any day over that.
  20. genovelle macrumors 6502a

    May 8, 2008
    Google doesn't deny their motives. People like you blindly refuse to listen because you get free stuff. You most likely rant and rave about the NSA even under the umbrella of national security. Google transcribes Google voice calls and scrubs your email for a profit. Do you really want a company who only makes money by exploiting your private data to have unlimited access to it.
  21. fredaroony macrumors 6502a

    Aug 1, 2011
    Got any proof?
  22. gotluck, May 9, 2014
    Last edited: May 9, 2014

    gotluck macrumors 603


    Dec 8, 2011
    East Central Florida

    FWIW I do rant and rave about the NSA even under the umbrella of national security. Cheers :)

    I dont care about my anonymously aggregated demographic data and I actually get something from google. (I've also paid them a good bit of money )

    This is what I have a problem with.
  23. Parasprite macrumors 68000


    Mar 5, 2013
    I don't care about any of this, because at least the data would serve a purpose.

    What I really wish is that they would stop making random things publicly accessible while forcing me to use my real name.


    It's possible that it is actually easier to implement on OS X than Windows, but I have no actual evidence to support that as any sort of assumption.
  24. Glassed Silver macrumors 68000

    Glassed Silver

    Mar 10, 2007
    Kassel, Germany
    Because bananas.
    Ignorant fool! :D

    Glassed Silver:mac
  25. Scellow macrumors member

    May 6, 2013

Share This Page