Yes of course, if I had to choose I would use wifi. I was simply comparing the data technologies offered by the companies themselves, not that plus what I can get from a coffee shop or home. You realize some people that are going to buy these phones are not going to be around wifi spots that often. So they WILL have to rely on a overpriced subpar technology.
I am making it out to be what AT&T offers. How many markets of the overall market does AT&T have UMTS/HSPDA deployed? its roughly 5-10% from the last numbers I read not to long ago. How widespread is EVDO offered from Sprint? I know its way larger than 5-10%. Pretty much everywhere I go with Sprint I have EVDO access.
It will be great when they come out with a rev 2 with HSPDA, maybe that will make it so 5-10% of AT&T customers get faster internet. But you do have to wonder why they did not make it HSPDA compatible right now? They did say they could not find a CDMA chipset that would be low power enough for what they wanted. So makes you wonder, maybe that have not found a HSPDA low power enough to do that either. I think it would be a long while before you see a rev 2 of the phone. With all the hype around it....just don't see it that soon.
So sure they have a very small market for their 3G access, but if we are talking about over all data access that is readily available to most customers, that is not even on the table.
Funny, I was just asking a question as to how AT&T can charge that much for a lesser technology and people pay it? And you fire back about the Sprint Nextel merger as if that has some relevance. Ok? Did they fumble it? Sure. Is Sprint still in a good company, in my 7 years with them, yeah really good. I worry about the service I get and the plans I have, and the Nextel merger did not effect either one of those. Not sure what that has to do with 3G technologies or AT&T's overpriced data plans on EDGE, but ok?