I don't have the time to do it, but there is an excellent case here for whomever is so inclined.
Before getting into it, google the following as one search entry: Verizon, Bluetooth, disabled, "Class Action"
AT&T is basically doing the same thing. They claim that they have not enabled MMS on the iPhone because their network is not ready for it, fears of bandwith issues... yet they have MMS enabled on all their other phones. They have AMPLE bandwidth... my sister can WATCH STREAMING TV ON HER AT&T CELL!!! Now, with them releasing the AT&T Navigator, which does NOT house the maps on the phone, and thus streams them, there is further evidence that they have ample bandwidth. They're just trying to delay it enough to the point where they feel, "If we enable it say in the late fall, that's not too far away; nobody will sue." But, if I know my fellow Americans as well as I think I do... somebody out there is litiginous enough to fight for all of us.
The same applies for tethering. They cannot claim their network is not ready/capable. They already have tethering enabled on their Blackberrys, and the network runs just fine!
Lastly their claims that they would need time to make adjustments in their network are totally bogus. AT&T is the first and tightest partner with Apple. When Apple comes up with a new feature, they figure out how it will work on the US network first, and test it on their network. Two of my friends who are Apple developers have already had MMS running on their iPhones for about 2 months now... so the network is already in place... definitely for MMS, likely for tethering as well.
The Verizon case comes into play as they had disabled certain functionalities of Bluetooth in one of their Motorola phones. In theory, they had done this so they could make more money by selling add-on features, or features that would have competed with what the phone was already capable of doing.
Anyhow, I could go on... but I'll leave it to y'all to add your two cents and pick it up from here.
Cheers
Before getting into it, google the following as one search entry: Verizon, Bluetooth, disabled, "Class Action"
AT&T is basically doing the same thing. They claim that they have not enabled MMS on the iPhone because their network is not ready for it, fears of bandwith issues... yet they have MMS enabled on all their other phones. They have AMPLE bandwidth... my sister can WATCH STREAMING TV ON HER AT&T CELL!!! Now, with them releasing the AT&T Navigator, which does NOT house the maps on the phone, and thus streams them, there is further evidence that they have ample bandwidth. They're just trying to delay it enough to the point where they feel, "If we enable it say in the late fall, that's not too far away; nobody will sue." But, if I know my fellow Americans as well as I think I do... somebody out there is litiginous enough to fight for all of us.
The same applies for tethering. They cannot claim their network is not ready/capable. They already have tethering enabled on their Blackberrys, and the network runs just fine!
Lastly their claims that they would need time to make adjustments in their network are totally bogus. AT&T is the first and tightest partner with Apple. When Apple comes up with a new feature, they figure out how it will work on the US network first, and test it on their network. Two of my friends who are Apple developers have already had MMS running on their iPhones for about 2 months now... so the network is already in place... definitely for MMS, likely for tethering as well.
The Verizon case comes into play as they had disabled certain functionalities of Bluetooth in one of their Motorola phones. In theory, they had done this so they could make more money by selling add-on features, or features that would have competed with what the phone was already capable of doing.
Anyhow, I could go on... but I'll leave it to y'all to add your two cents and pick it up from here.
Cheers